Quantcast
Channel: Stock Opportunities - ValuePickr Forum
Viewing all 1802 articles
Browse latest View live

Likhitha Infrastructure: CNG Infrastructure Play in India

$
0
0

Hi All,

Starting my first topic in ValuePickr on a small-cap company by the name of Likhitha Infrastructure (BSE 543240, NSE LIKHITHA, CMP 354, PE - 16x, PS - 2.8x, EVEBITDA - 11x). Listed on exchanges in Oct, 2020. Claims to be only listed company in CNG pipeline laying space.

I discovered this company while running a screener of small-cap companies with significant promoter holding with a consistent history of Sales Growth over a decade and ROCE and ROE growth of > 20% for the last 5 years which were optically cheap (PE < 10x or PEG < 1x). This threw up a list of ~30 companies, of which Likhitha was one. Likhitha came to my attention once again when I noticed there was a possible CNG theme developing in India for the next 5-10 years and when Likhitha filed in BSE on 2nd Jan stating they had bagged a fresh 250 Cr order in Q3 from CGDs (City Gas Distribution Orgs).

Past performance details

Thesis for investment: CNG usage as % of India’s energy mix is supposed to go up from 6% to 15% by 2030. MoPNG is aggressively increasing number of CGDs across the country to increase supply of PNG to households and industries and CNG to automobiles. Govt push for CNG is to achieve carbon goals for 2030 as CNG causes less harmful emissions compared to gasoline/diesel. Unlike gasoline/diesel, India has the capacity to supply 50%+ of its own CNG demand, thus CNG adoption will reduce forex outgo and increase energy security to an extent. Strong tailwinds appear to be present in favour of CNG for this decade in India. Likhitha being in the CNG infra space, will gain from CNG growth and adoption across industries - automotive, industrials, household.

Understanding the business:

Likhitha operates primarily in 3 verticals

  1. Cross Country CNG Pipeline Laying - Company n its 20+ years of history claims to have laid 1000 KMs+ CNG pipeline in India
  2. Pipeline laying for CGDs - MoPNG is aggressively increasing number of Geographical Areas under CGD services. O&G companies bid for these tenders and winning companies sub-contract the pipeline laying and project management work to specialist 3rd party companies like Likhitha. A list of Likhitha’s current projects and completed projects can be accessed via the links.
  3. O&M Contracts (Operating and maintenance contracts) - Company provides maintenance services for already laid CGD networks.

Claimed competitive advantages/strengths of business model:

  1. Access to growth capital being the only listed company in this space. Promoter stake is 74%, which can be diluted to an extent to raise growth capital for capturing larger projects
  2. Claims to do capex in machinery used for pipeline laying as opposed to opex (machinery on rentals) by other companies giving them a cost advantage while quoting for tenders
  3. Business model is inherently asset and capital light - Client (O&G) company sources max raw material and makes it available for laying work at site. Company’s procurement of raw materials are of low intensity and thus claim to be protected largely from r/m price fluctuations.
  4. Number of projects and prestigious clients under their belt, which boosts their credentials in tenders. Their clients include - IOCL, GAIL, Indian Oil-Adani, AGL, IGL, ONGC, HPCL, Torrent Gas

Points in favour of company’s performance:

  1. Consistent topline and bottom-line growth in 3-5-10 year horizon
  2. Increasing operating margins - OPM has expanded from 11-13% pre FY19 to 20%+ since then. This coincides with the start of the expansion in the O&M segment which company claims is high margin
  3. Order book of 1250 Cr (5x TTM revenues) with 20% belonging to O&M segment
  4. Prestigious clients which are giants in the O&G/CNG space.

Red flags/Corporate Governance HLs:

  1. Very poor EBITDA to cash flow conversion. Conversion had improved in FY 20, but dipped badly in FY 21 owing to huge increase in WC
  2. Company in its latest AR claimed to bring down Account Payables to almost 0 stating that they get 5-10% cash discount, but the cash discount doesn’t clearly reflect in COGS reduction from FY20 to FY21
  3. Huge jump in inventory days from FY19. This coincides with expansion in O&M business but may not explain this steep a rise. In past also, WC discipline has been wayward in the company.
  4. The daughter of the promoter has been appointed as CFO in the last few months. She seems adequately qualified (MS from Illinois University and experience in PWC) but is inexperienced. The last CFO was also appointed internally just before IPO, when the then CFO quit.
  5. Present CEO salary is very low (17 LPA) compared to promoter (MD) remuneration (370 LPA). Makes one question the seriousness of CEO appointment.
  6. No concalls/investor presentations - high opacity

Key risks:

  1. Requires sustained Govt. policy push for tailwinds to sustain
  2. Max business dealings with PSUs, can put pressure on WC, margins
  3. Corporate Governance risks as highlighted above

Status: I am tracking with a small position. Wait and watch approach right now.

I am trying to reach out to a Project Engineer/Site Engineer at one of the O&G companies where Likhitha has an ongoing Project to get their feedback. Will update if I receive some info. Looking forward to community members doing their own study to build on this and hopefully some folks in this forum can bring in some feedback on company operations on ground or feedback on management, which seems elusive to me right now.

Cheers!

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic


Global offshore

$
0
0

*Global Offshore turnaround visible

Turnaround possible company has good assets, re structured debt, strong promoter. Transformation from low base to high base generally will impact Balance Sheet

Eq 24.73 crs Market cap Rs 144 crs fleet now 7 ( earlier 14) Assets Value Rs 650-700 crs Debt Rs 131 crs payable in next 12-14 months

Global offshore once was in talks with Bourbon France for complete sell of the co at Rs 2500 3000 crs fell apart. That time co had reached market cap of Rs 2200 crs. Aditya Garware is the owner and he is from Garware family which own Garware Hitech Films and Garware Technical Fibres ltd

All the fleets were Norwegian which are world class and command good price. These vessels can work even in rough see of AFRICA. few vessels were earlier deployed by worlds best co’s including Shell.

international vessel market collapsed as oil started falling.

This is a typical industry where idle vessels require huge maintenance cost which kept bleeding from 2016.

First signs of bottoming though seen in late 2018 the excess supply of vessels did not change fortunes.

Then hit the pandemic.

As a result the company collapsed.

They sold almost 7 vessels to clear it major debt and remain floated. The same can be seen in the balancesheet.

It is still a going concern

Firming of oil prices and big gap of almost 4 to 5 years have prevented manufacturing of new vessels at Netherland.

Firming of oil prices revived the demand of supply vessels many fold.

*The charter rates have shot up whopping from 6000 to 20000 which is visible from competitor Seamec’s disclosures.

You can do the math.

.

There are only few companies in the world like Bourbon, Shell and GLOBAL offshore which own Havyard Leirvick Norway made vessels which are costliest in the world and avg age of global offshore vessels is 7 yrs. Seamec vessels are 30yrs.

It is penny stock with visible turnaround

Thoughts,ideas, feedback always welcome.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Olectra Greentech - Electric Bus Opportunity

$
0
0

Background

Goldstone Infratech Limited is registered in the year 2000 with their only product segment as electric insulators. The company got listed in the stock exchanges in the year 2002.The promoter group is Trinity Infraventures limited who are also promoters of Goldstone Technologies which is another listed company in India.

The company started electric buses division in 2015 having a strong partnership tie-up in India with Warren Buffet backed BYD Auto from China.BYD is a pioneer in EV battery space and has a significant presence in EV ecosystem right from rechargeable batteries to electric buses, trucks, cars etc.As per Wikipedia BYD page - As of 2021, BYD Auto is the world’s second largest New Energy Vehicles carmaker in the world, with 329,408 units sold in January-September 2021

In the year 2018, the company’s name is changed to Olectra Greentech, and MEIL Holdings, which is a subsidiary of MEIL(Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Limited) company came up with open offer and increased stake in Olectra. At the moment, MEIL Holdings hold more than 50% stake in Olectra making it a subsidiary and all the previous promoter group entities have reduced their stake.
My understanding is, there was an unwritten agreement between the old and new promoters that the old promoters have to completely exit Olectra once new management takes over.

The new promoter group(MEIL) is one of the biggest and successful infra player in India and have been regularly featuring in the top 100 of Hurun India Rich list.

The bet on Olectra is primarily a bet on the E-Bus segment which has huge opportunity. The revenue growth in insular division is minimal from past 10 years.

Electric Bus

Industry Structure and Development:

The oath taken for Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Buses in India by NITI Aayog in 2017-18 through Department of Heavy Industries (DHI) has initially launched, FAME I scheme, facilitating “Capital Subsides” for 560 of Electric Buses has given encouragement to State Transport Undertakings (STUs) in 11 Indian cities, to own the EV Buses in their fleet, and their long awaited desire to operate and witness the performance of Electric Buses became a reality in India with the subsidy support provided .The Succeeding FAME II scheme notified in 2019-20 was initially aimed to deploy 5595 no. of E Buses in various STUs under Gross Cost Contract (GCC) Operational model, which has attracted attention of 64 cities to deploy Electric Buses without any investment from STUs. In 2020-21, DHI has sanctioned subsidies for additional 670 Buses. GCC model has enabled Private investments in this sector and STUs thus need not facilitate any finance arrangements for the After-subsidy costs of Electric Buses.

Since the deployment of Electric Buses under GCC Operational model is for the first time in India, STUs have taken some time to understand the technical feasibility, financial viability, economic feasibility and Operational compatibility of E-Buses, including Routes and Schedules management. Early deployment of E Buses under Operational Model in cities like Pune has given tremendous insights, analysis and study practices to all the other STUs in India. Delay in understanding the EV technology and viability factors has led to conclude projects in snail pace. The successful deployment of Electric Buses in GCC model has ignited the momentum in EV Bus adoption in India. Despite non-operation of Public Transport during COVID Wave I & II, Department of Heavy Industries – DHI along with State Transport Undertakings - STUs, and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) have successfully implemented FAME II.

More than 1000 electric buses are running across the country with an additional 2600 electric bus orders are in execution stage under FAME -2 scheme. Accordingly, DHI has extended the FAME II scheme validity till 31st March 2024 for a period of additional 3 Years from 1st April 2021 It is also understood that in India that STUs having deployed Electric Buses with Longer Range have been be progressive in their next set of deployment. The COVID-19 crisis will create many new challenges for this sector, especially in urban areas and intercity segments with high travel demand. Finally, the vision of NITI Aayog that only electric vehicles should be sold in India after 2030 would result in a reduction of 156 million tons in Diesel and Petrol consumption with net saving of roughly Rs. 3.9 Lakh Crore by 2030 at present oil prices.

Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report
The management discussion and analysis section starting from page 90 to 95 in the 2021 annual report is worth reading to understand the complete context

Main Products/Segments


Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report



Source for the images above – Company’s Investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Main Markets/Customers

The State Transport Corporations(SRTUs) are the main customers for Olectra. Olectra is the market leader in electric buses in India.


Source for the image above – Company’s Investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Current Market/Industry Trends

Outlook

Electric Bus market is expected to grow rapidly in India considering various factors like hikes in Diesel prices, Diesel fleet purchase holiday during COVID-19 impact, EV Policies across country, State Government commitment to EV adoption,Grid balancing factors and Power surplus States, Lesser Bus ratio vs 1000 Population, etc., NITI Aayog has mandated aggregation of demand for 5,500 Electric Buses in India through Convergence Energy Services Limited (CESL) and World Resources Institute(WRI) , for which the process has already begun by CESL.

Diesel prices in India have been hiked 69 times in this Year, which is expected to be further increased. Huge financial impact is seen on the Public Transport Undertakings fleet operations with the increased diesel prices. Hikes in Fuel costs are one major factor that been shift Diesel to Electric. The said hikes are also impacting the Total Cost of Ownership for Diesel fueled Buses. The current Climate Policy in India is rightly addressing the challenges of electric buses and providing an environment to accelerate their adoption and implementation.

This current trend of increase in Diesel prices, seems consistent and expected to continue. Diesel Fuel cost is contributing to 40% of CPK in Mofussil NonAC Buses and 50% in AC Intercity Buses. Public and Private Transport fleet expected an early adoption with faster growth compared to previous Years adoption.

CESL entry into E Bus aggregation in India will further improve the Market opportunities as CESL will be acting as Aggregator between STUs, Operators and OEMs. CESL main focus is to aggregate the demand in 9 cities taking into consideration Public Transport, Last Mile connectivity for Metro, Airport Tarmac Electric fleet, etc., In the FAME II Phase I Scheme, a New Segments like Intercity deployment has successfully taken off in form of concluding contracts by MSRTC, KSRTC and APSRTC.

Last Mile connectivity Project has also been initiated by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – DMRC under FAME II Scheme. Opportunities in the form of Metro Neo projects in India will further open a new segment for Electric Buses. Few Green fund agencies are also aggressively preparing their strategies to deploy Electric Buses in India for Private Sector deployment.

Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report


Many states have got their EV policy draft ready.

Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Bullish Viewpoints

  • Gross Cost Contract model will solve the biggest problem of SRTUs - huge Capex front load is no longer a viable option especially with many years of losses
    • The cost of operational costs and maintenance of electric buses is very less compared to diesel and CNGs

Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

  • Well placed to attract ESG investors and Green funds
  • Government of India wants to reduce dependency on Oil and so pushing EVs, eventually pushing for only EVs after 2030
  • Leader in securing the orders and first mover advantage having operations from 2017. At the moment, they have a market share of ~40% of electric bus orders in India
  • The opportunity size is huge as the bet is not just on the Electric Bus alone as its future plans include manufacture of Trucks, LCVs, 3 wheeler’s etc


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Bearish Viewpoints

  • Technology rests with BYD and BYD can start its operations in India on its own. They already have their plant in Chennai and were planning to venture into categories other than Electric buses on their own previously.
    • The mitigation to this is to have an exclusive partnership similar to Maruti-Suzuki model. At the moment, BYD Auto has zero stake in Olectra shares.
  • BYD being from China can affect company’s prospects adversely due to sentiments at border
  • Inherent risk of damages to public property (incl buses) in exceptional situations likes riots
  • Regulatory risk as government can enforce new policy unfavourable to EVs or delay EV adoption to save existing industry like postponing scrappage policy
  • The target customer market segment is government backed State Road Transport Undertakings(SRTUs) and B2G segment is very tough nut to crack
    • The new promoters (MEIL) are well known for executing government projects(50% of order book) and have a successful track record of completing big projects
  • Electric Bus technology is relatively new and we don’t know all the risks associated with it
  • Promoter is new to bus industry and the other competitors like Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, JBM Auto are well entrenched in this industry from long
  • Currently, government is supporting EV push by giving subsidies in the form of FAME-I and FAME-2, no idea whether they will continue to support
    • However, with Gross Cost Contract(GCC) model, there is no CAPEX load on SRTUs
  • The cost of battery(Lithium Ion) is around 40 to 50% of the overall cost of the electric bus. Any significant increase in the price of Lithium will adversely impact the sustainability of the business model
    • China has 12.2% of world’s lithium production in 2020


Source – Trading Economics

  • Elon Musk. No idea, what are his plans in electric bus space or even new battery technology

Interesting Viewpoints

  • Olectra is either in trails or presence in 40 STUs


    Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

  • Promoter is not just looking at Public Transport but other adjacencies like inter-city/inter-state, private transport segment and also into TARMAC buses in Airport


    Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Barriers to Entry

  • There are almost no barriers to entry
  • The target customer segment is State Road Transport Undertakings and dealing with government organisations is very difficult
  • Olectra is the only company giving more than 250 kms for single charge. This is a great barrier especially if one is interested to run inter-city buses
    • If I remember correctly, Ashok Leyland uses replaceable batteries to mitigate this risk
  • To execute GCC contracts of bigger scale and long payback periods, you need to have very good money muscle and so smaller players may not be able to compete

Business Model

Olectra has BYD as the technology partner which basically provides the most important components of electric bus like battery and technology.

Olectra mostly does the assembling of parts. Usually, the cost of electric bus will be in the range of 1 to 2.5 crores.

The most important target customer segment for electric bus is SRTUs and they are all usually running in operational losses.

This is where Gross Cost Contract model will help as SRTUs don’t need to do Capex but agree on paying bus operators with price per km.

This model is already operational in some diesel buses and compared to diesel buses, the cost per km is very less for electric buses.


Holding Structure

Evey Trans which is a subsidiary of MEIL Holdings, buys electric buses from Olectra and creates Special Purpose Vehicles(SPV) for each Gross Cost Contract(GCC).

Hence, you see many related party transactions. I just mentioned only two in the above structure


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Valuation Model

The bet on Olectra is basically a bet on the number of E-buses it sells.



Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Based on my back of the envelope calculations – Olectra delivered 120 E-buses in Q3 FY22 so far

  • Order Book on 08.11 – 1450
  • Order Book on 09.11 – 1550
  • Fresh Order on – 01.12 – 100
  • Order Book on 01.12 – (1550+100) – 1650
  • Order Book after deliveries made on – 01.12 – 1530

So, 120(1650-1530) E-buses have been delivered in Q3 FY22 so far. This itself generates revenue far greater than H1 FY22(29 buses) ~ 234 crores(1.95 Cr as average bus price)

Olectra is a growing company and we are currently at the start of EV bus adoption. The below analysis shows the opportunity ahead.


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Considering that Olectra is able to get 5% of 200,000 buses – it will translate to 10,000 buses per year. Let’s say, we consider the average price of Olectra bus as 1 crore, it will translate to 10,000 crores.

Olectra is currently having a market cap of ~7,000 crores. It will translate to Price/Sales of less than 1. The estimates provided do not include other adjacencies like Trucks, LCVs and 3-Wheelers etc

If the question is whether the company is really prepared for manufacture of 10,000 buses per year, I think yes. I have been hearing about this number from at least 2 years.

The recent land acquisition of 150 acres in Telangana substantiates the conviction that company is moving in the same direction.

Corporate Governance Scan

  • Promoter cancelled 91,00,000 convertible Warrants on 10.04.2020 during peak of covid which were allotted on 10.10.2018. The subscription amount received at the time of allotment of warrants was forfeited
    • The main reason is due to the fact that the share price was way below compared to the warrants price of 175 rupees per share
    • However, they increased the stake in multiple tranches recently at around 400
  • The previous promoter was not known for best corporate governance practices
    • The new Promoter is now having more than 50% stake in Olectra and the earlier promoter sold most of their stake
  • MEIL itself wants to list their company in next 1 or 2 years. After they taken over Olectra, there is a significant improvement in their disclosures and investor relations
    • Olectra website is showing all kinds of transparency in disclosures.
    • I believe, they will stick to their highest corporate governance standards at least till the IPO of their flagship company

Forensic Scan/Red Flags

  • MD Salary ~2 Crores. PBT ~8.44 for H1 FY22. Annualizing it to 16.88 which means ~11%
  • As it is a growing company with much growth expected in future, the salary doesn’t seem to be a red flag
  • No Stock options offered to MD which means no “Skin in the game”
  • Subsidiary Evey Trans was sold to parent company MEIL Holdings. The reason for this transfer is to ensure that the promoter will shell out the money to buy buses from Olectra and in the process, de-risk the financial liability
  • There is a risk of related party amounts between the promoter entities. This will be majorly with Evey Trans which buys the buses from Olectra. Having a tab on Cashflow will help in identifying in any lapses of payment


Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report

Resources

The opportunity is similar to how Jio disrupted telecom. There is neither past baggage nor debt and incumbents have debt and incumbents will also need to work on their existing services.

The other advantage is Olectra has the edge in technology in terms of electric bus among the existing competitors.

The promoter has the money muscle, best technology partner(BYD) and all he needs to do is hire/nurture best talent.

Can Olectra disrupt the bus industry like how its promoter MEIL did in infra? Only time will tell.

Looking forward to the views of other investors.

Disclosure(s) – Invested 6% of PF and biased. Actively tracking from 2018.

14 posts - 6 participants

Read full topic

Management buying own stock but concealing expansion plans from BSE

$
0
0

I am a shareholder of Ishita Drugs and Industries Ltd. I started buying this stock last year around July/August after I read their application for expansion. They are a pharma company into manufacturing APIs. Recently they also got approval from the Gujarat government for their expansion.

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/state/Reports_State.aspx?pid=u0YHD4RhhnT8J3Q2J0v3SDVtLPfKYL6TTfGGdan4wvpTOqDdgCnwGbrqzFCWYDa0&idd=FMO2/7kH3jhFBd9/vzfALA==&forms=iAx+nZUbnlcYClzyIsQ0ZA==&sw_pid=kWm5DITBrh6XScAVS2ZRkQlCbuPFbesuaOx%2Bx%2BLxCXk%3D

This is a material development and I assumed that the company would inform BSE about getting final approval. They have done nothing of the sort at any stage. Even their annual reports and results make no mention of expansion. However they have been buying their own stock from the open market. Abha Agrawal, wife of the founder Jagdish Agrawal has bought more than 30,000 shares (Over 1% equity) in the last two weeks.

Today BSE sent them a letter asking them to clarify why the price has been moving up. They sent a standard reply saying there is no price sensitive information that needs to be disclosed and made no mention of getting an approval for expansion.

Now my question is- Isn’t a final approval for expansion a material development that the stock exchange needs to be informed about? Can the company avoid informing BSE and go on to buy its own shares? Is this legal? This information may be in the public domain but not everyone would know. Aren’t they required to inform BSE?

The management is very unfriendly. I sent mails, made calls last year. No one was willing to talk to a shareholder. Even during the pandemic this was one of the few companies which held physical AGMs and not online AGMs towards the end of the AGM season probably to discourage shareholder participation. I bought this stock because it is a debt free company and has got approval for expansion despite this attitude of the management.

This is not a recommendation to buy the stock. If you do buy it, do so after a thorough evaluation and at your own risk. As I stated earlier I am a shareholder already. I only want to know from some informed people here if the company’s behavior is legal.

4 posts - 3 participants

Read full topic

Ethanol - Sugar stocks

$
0
0

For past few months hearing of Ethanol story and how Sugar companies can benefit from it in coming years.

Currently all sugar stocks have moved to 52 week high. Is still upward movement is there or price is factored?

3 posts - 3 participants

Read full topic

Websol energy system ltd

$
0
0

Websol Energy Systems Ltd

The company is one of the leading players in the solar photovoltaic cells and modules manufacturing segment. The Company enjoys a prominent presence in this sector due to its vast experience of two-and-a half decades. The Company commenced its business as a fully export oriented unit, mainly serving Europe (specially Germany and Italy) and US. The Company manufactured quality products for exports and its panels have been successfully functioning for the last 26 years.

Business analysis

The company enjoys protection from Cheap Chinese goods and tariff was imposed to protect it.

Fy21

“The government announced an increase in customs tariff that becomes effective from April 2022. We believe that this will make it possible for much of the country’s long-term appetite for cells, panels and modules to be serviced from within, a validation of the country’s Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) commitment.

The result is that what was a pricing differential between the landed cost of Chinese solar products and our price of 25% a few years ago is likely to decline considerably by FY2021-22.”

The question needs to be asked is why tariff protection is needed for it to sell its goods if the company enjoys any competitive advantage.

The company enjoys certifications from its customers and due to a long time in the industry it has been able to create relationships

FY21

:”The Company’s product certifications and strong relationships lead to sustainable offtake. The Company is ranked as one of the largest and most competitive solar photovoltaic manufacturers in India with the cost of production being among the lowest across all Indian PV manufacturers. “

The company faces poor demand scenario time and again as we see in various places of its AR

Fy20

“WHAT WAS A 25% PRICING DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN THE LANDED COST OF CHINESE SOLAR PRODUCTS AND OUR PRICE IS LIKELY TO DECLINE TO NIL DURING FY 2020‑21

During the year under review, your Company could not utilise its full capacity because of overall industry scenario and lack of demand. Also there was huge pressure from China on pricing end. After implementation of Safeguard Duty and other positive measures taken by the GOI we expect that your company will perform in FY 2020-21. We are hopeful that support from GOI will be continuing to green energy”

Further it is reliant on Government support for selling its products.

We see similar problems in FY 19 as well where it faced both volume and price pressure. The company faced high raw material cost of 84% as evident from screener. Also there was Exchange fluctuation loss of 5 crores. It seems whatever could go wrong for the company went wrong. Also we see that the company has not been able to pay undisputed Delhi Vat.

Fy19

“Lacklustre demand and heightened price erosion on account of increased product dumping by China comprised the main challenges that had an adverse impact on our financial performance. The company’s revenue from operations declined []% to Rs. 68.56 crore in 2018-19, from Rs. 183.27 crore in 2017-18. Other income grew by []% to Rs. 17.29 crore during the year. Lower revenues and higher fixed costs depressed EBIDTA to a negative Rs. 7.29 crore, from Rs. 26.79 crore reported in the previous year. This impacted profitability, with the company slipping to a net loss of Rs. 28.90 crore in 2018-19, from a net profit of Rs. 1.83 crore in the previous year. Aiding by positive government policies, the company is taking a number of measures with a view to restore profitability in the near-term.”

Further this loss would have been higher if not for sundry balances written back of 13 crores.

We see similar challenges in FY 18 as well where Chinese prices led to deterioration of business of the company. Further we see that the company had to enter into settlement with lenders.

Fy18

“The scenario is challenging as well. Over the last few years, some of the largest Chinese manufacturers commissioned some of the world’s largest solar cell and module capacities, a competitive positioning that made it possible for them to sell at progressively lower costs. As a result, there has been a virtual meltdown in realizations. This decline has made it imperative for manufacturers like us – and across the world for that matter - to match Chinese prices.

During the year under review, your Company was not able to utilize the manufacturing capacity at its optimum. During this financial year, the Company completed OTS with all banks and their total dues were paid. A loan with ARC is outstanding and will be paid in installments as per their sanction with no interest payable on the outstanding loan as per the terms of the sanction.”

In Fy 17 , the situation was not as bad and it was able to utilize capacity. And it proudly proclaimed that it did not default on its FCCB bonds, but it neither paid them off.

Fy17

“During the year under review your company was able to utilize the manufacturing capacity at its optimum. During the year your company has settled all NPA bank accounts through OTS. Your company has also been able to improve the efficiency of the output of its finished goods. Addition to the installed capacity to the production facility during the year has added to the earnings of the Company.

Further, the Company had Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (“FCCBs”) amounting to US$ 16,800,000 and interest accrued thereon is US$ 11,680.000 which matured on November, 2012. The same were neither converted into Equity Shares nor was any payment made for their redemption. However, the Company, in Extra-Ordinary General Meeting of its members held on May 26, 2016, has obtained the sanction of its members to re-structure the FCCBs on revised terms and conditions including reducing the value of FCCBs to US$ 12,000,000 and complete waiver of accrued interest. The re-structured FCCBs are scheduled to be redeemed latest by May 1, 2021 if not redeemed or converted earlier than that date. Consequently, the Company is not in default on account of borrowing through FCCB route.”

We further note that the Capital reserve has made by writeback of loans. So company conveniently claims its debt as its equity. Further we see that in Audit report over the years repeatedly no confirmation is received from parties

We see that the company has been always bullish about the prospects of renewable energy over conventional sources. However in 2016 it admitted that coal is here to stay. This points out that we can never be sure of what company projects about the future of its industry. We also see in 2016 that undisputed dues are not paid by the company.

FY16

“Finally, a large part of the solar system cost is import linked. A scenario where the INR depreciates very significantly would lead to a rise in solar costs for India relative to coal. This would delay the rise of solar. For the same reason, it is important for the government to plan a hedge against this scenario by adequately encouraging localisation and the creation of a domestic ecosystem.”

In 2015 we see that the company had better prospects which led to profits. We see that the prospects of the company are cyclical with some good years and some bad years. We also notice that company is talking about protective duties since much earlier which happened only in 2021. Also we see that at optimum capacity also the company has not been able to generate profit.

Fy15

“During the year under review your company was able to utilize the manufacturing capacity at its optimum. Sales have increased, there by company was able to make cash profit amounting to ` 376.51 lacs. The concerned Government department is in the process of initiating the imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of solar cells and modules and has at the same time outlined the requirement of domestic content under various solar schemes to revive the industry. These positive steps will help your Company to augment its sales and profitability.”

We also notice the precarious condition of the company when in audit report it was mentioned:

“As regards delay in payment of undisputed statutory dues mentioned in para 11(f)(i) of the Annexure to the Auditors’ Report, it is submitted that it was due to the adverse financial condition as well as non-realization of receivables in time and that the same will be paid in due course of time together with applicable interest, if any. b. As regards the delay in the repayment of the principal sums and interest thereon to the banks / financial institutions mentioned in para (ix) of the Annexure to the Auditors’ Report, it is submitted that it was due to continued losses incurred by the Company, however the co is under the process of OTS with the Consortium banks. c. With reference to point no 11(f)(iii) of the audit report it is hereby clarified that the delay by a month in transferring the amount to IPF was purely unintentional. As the transfer involve other outsiders and intermediaries in the same and so the whole process of transferring the said amount was delayed due to some procedural requirements which took an exceptional amount of additional time in getting due clearance. d. As regard FCCB, mentioned in para 11(e) of the Auditors’ Report, the bond holder is still holding the bonds which were expired and his status is now unsecured creditor. Company is approaching RBI for negotiation for settlement with the Bond Holder.”

This shows that the poor condition of the company in the past where it defaulted on government dues and also on its debt. Also the company was referred to BIFR

We see that even with capacity utilization , the company was in losses. This shows the brutality of the industry.

Fy 14

“During the year under review your company was able to uƟ lize the manufacturing capacity at its optimum but the sales realization continued to remain lower thereby resulting in losses for yet another year.””

We see the volatility in the prices prevalent in the industry in 2013 where the finished goods, raw materials and INR depreciation wiped out the company.

2013

“During the current financial period of nine months (ie. 2012 – 13) as well as the last financial period of fifteen months (ie. 2011-12), we witnessed a significant decline in the global prices of the raw materials and finished goods coupled with the devaluation in the Indian Rupees vs US Dollar which resulted in a sharp decline in profitability leading to erosion of entire net worth of your Company.”

Again there was a crash in RM prices which led to crash in realizations , forex loss and demand reduction. This is again proof of industry economics.

2012

“We witnessed a substantial over 60% fall in raw material prices, which percolated down to reduce finished goods prices. The Company suffered a huge blow owing to losses in outstanding contracts, pre-order contracts and production. Raw material prices collapsed 60% between April-November 2011, moderating end product selling price from 14 per unit (three years ago) to 4 per unit now.”

Foreign exchange: Volatility in foreign exchange affected profitability with the result that we suffered a forex loss of `60 cr in 2011-12

Subdued demand in Europe: We witnessed slackening demand in the EU region on account of its economical troubles. However it is expected that this highly fragmented industry is likely to consolidate on account of increasing collaborations between Indian and European firms where subsidy cuts in key markets like Germany and Italy will result in a global oversupply of solar panels.”

Further the company had to restructure its debts and also defaulted on its dues :

Fy 12

“Debt restructuring: With prices falling drastically and capex invested three years ago, we had to renegotiate debt as interest rates remained high. In March 2012, we underwent bank restructuring in which our working capital loans were converted to term loans with a moratorium of two years and repayment period of seven years. The capex loans were also restructured with a moratorium of two years and repayment period of seven years

The Company has made delayed deposits with appropriate authorities the amount deducted/accrued in the books of accounts in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other statutory dues as applicable to it. As per the information and explanations given to us the following undisputed amounts in respect of the abovementioned statutory dues were outstanding as at 30th June, 2012”

We also notice an interesting aspect where all around increase in fees payable in a terrible year 2012

“Amounts paid / payable to Auditors – (a) Audit fees 3,12,500/- (Previous period 1,50,000/-), plus the applicable service tax. (b) In other capacity in respect of certification work 62,500/- (Previous period 37,500/) plus the applicable service tax. (c) For Audit under section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 93,750/- (Previous period 50,000/-), plus the applicable service tax.”

Management remuneration

Reasonable 80/90 lacs but it was taken during loss times of the company as well. This also shows promoters will use company irrespective of its financial conditions

Ratio Analysis

SSGR

We find that the company has always had a negative SSGR. This is evident when it had to default in its debt, as it was living beyond its means.

The NFAT has always fluctuated between 1 and 0.62. We see that the asset turns are low. So to achieve high ROCE, the company has to have high EBIT from DUpoint analysis. But we find the highest margins achieved in its history from screener is 11 % in 2011 and in 2021 it has 22 % operating margin, but with lower raw material costs. So if RM costs normalizes can we expect higher margins. Thus unless there is massive demand, the company will not achieve higher ROCE.

Related Party

Nothing material w.r.t size of the company

Valuations

The company trades at a PE of 35, with high margins (due to lower RM costs 56%). If we normalize the PE it will come to 40/45 range. So the company is expensive given its chequered past. But the question we should ask ourselves has the future come for solar industry. The biggies of Indian corporate have entered it and are doing acquisitions. With protective duties in place, can this be a La Opala moment for this Calcutta based company.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Minda Corporation- An Auto Ancillary Catering to EV OEM's⁹

$
0
0

We all know about Minda Industries as a well recognised EV stock , but few of us know about Minda corporation which is also in to a completely different set of products being supplied to EV.

Sometimes business splits are enablers of new directions as individuals chart their own destinies. In 1995 when the combined Minda Group split, it was divided between the two brothers NK Minda and Ashok Minda as the UNO Minda and Spark Minda Groups respectively.

Set up by their father SL Minda in 1958, the company was first known as Minda Switch Auto in 1986. At the time of the split, the switch, light, horn and batteries division passed on to the elder brother, while the younger sibling Ashok Minda entered the domain of safety security and restraint systems, driver information and Telematics systems and interior systems. These business demarcations ensured the two brothers did not compete with each other and facilitated each other’s independent growth.
Today , Minda corporation is an EV component supplier to all major OEM of EV’s.
The products manufactured by Minda corporation can be found in this link below :

The screener data for Minda corporation is as follows :
https://www.screener.in/company/MINDACORP/consolidated/
During quater ending q2, 2022, it reported a Sales of 750 crore with a net profit of 39 crore , a jump.of 51%.
In a recent interview , Asok Minda MD CEO of Minda corporation explains about order book position and how they are geared up to take advantage of the EV Boom.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Inflame Appliances

$
0
0

Inflame Appliances
The company is engaged in the manufacturing of glass gas stove/cooktops; hobs; and chimneys.

They are selling these under their own brand, Inflame, in the domestic and overseas markets. Within India, they cater to 18 states. Inflame has a network of 40+ distributors across India. In FY21, exports sales were around 1 Cr (out of total sales of 20 Cr). The major market in exports is African countries. But the prime focus of the management is domestic market rather than exports for the next 5 years.

They are also doing contract manufacturing of glass top LPG stove in 2/3/4 burners in premium ranges for brands such as Hindware and Avaante. (It is worth noting that Inflame is not exactly a contract manufacturer- Inflame designs the products itself and then presents these to the OEMs. However, since I do not know of the specific term used when a company does this, I have used the term contract manufacturing throughout this writeup.) They have been manufacturing different models of gas stoves for Hindware for about 4 years and currently contribute to over 80% of Hindware’s total demand:

They are also into contract manufacturing of chimneys within the country, which will cater to the requirements of other big brands. Clients in contract manufacturing of chimneys are Hindware, Sunflame etc. Seems like clients are very happy with Inflame’s quality. Inflame is the exclusive manufacturer of electrical chimneys, hobs and gas stoves for AKAI India. They are also in the pool of suppliers for chimneys for BSH Home Appliances (Bosch Siemens Home Appliances). The company can probably gain a higher wallet share of clients as well as do contract manufacturing for them in other products e.g. they extended the partnership with Hindware, where they were doing contract manufacturing of glass top LPG stove to now also start doing chimneys manufacturing.

They have recently been adding many clients like Wonderchef, Kaff Appliances (10,000 units of chimneys) etc:


Just to clarify here- in stoves they are doing both, own brand and contract; but in chimneys they are only doing contract manufacturing. In chimneys, no company does production of more than 3 lakh units per annum. By doing contract manufacturing rather than their own brands in chimneys, they do not have such a ceiling on the sales and they are not restricting their potential market share in the competitive, fragmented market (they can do contract manufacturing for all brands).

It is interesting to note that these companies currently import all the chimneys from the overseas market. This way, it is also a play on import substitution:


image

Not only are they acting as import substitution for clients, but they themselves are also substituting with domestic suppliers for the components they are importing.

They have done massive reduction in import dependence from China, from 50-60% to 2-3%:


image

They are expanding their product range and have started manufacturing electrical chimneys, glass cooktops, glass hobs and cooking ranges to increase presence in the cooking appliances market of the country.

The latest currently installed capacity in units per month is 10,000 for Stoves; 5,000 for Hobs; and 20,000 to 22,000 for Cooker Hoods (Chimneys). Average realisations in chimneys are in the range of Rs 4000 to Rs 4500 per unit; for hobs it is Rs 5500 to Rs 5700 per unit; for gas stoves it is Rs 1600 to Rs 1700 per unit. Using the lower bound for each, monthly revenue at peak utilisation for stoves can be Rs 1.6 Cr; for hobs can be Rs 2.7 Cr; for chimneys can be Rs 8 Cr. Total monthly revenue can be 12.3 Cr (1.6+2.7+8). Hence annual revenue from existing capacities can be Rs 147 Cr. TTM sales are Rs 28 Cr. Latest utilisation was 50% each for gas stoves and chimneys; and around 15% for hobs. They are expecting to reach peak utilisation between March and June 2022. Management has said that at peak utilisation of current existing capacities, EBITDA margins can be 18-25%.

They are already under the process to scale up the current production capacities via large capex:

They are planning to set up a new plant in Hyderabad with installed capacity in units per month is 10,000 for Stoves; 5,000 for Hobs; and 20,000 to 22,000 for Cooker Hoods (Chimneys), i.e., capacity will double post Hyderabad plant:


The reason they have chosen Hyderabad is because of various subsidies offered by the state government:

They have also got 2 acres of land for new capex at a subsidized price:

They are expecting this to be completed within next 6 months:

Seems clear that chimneys would be a big driver of growth going forward.

The key raw materials for the company are various types of Brass Burner, Brass gas Valve, MS Pipe and Aluminium Mixing Tube, Toughened Glass, Pan Support Rings and Various Rubber Components. They are backwards integrated into the making of sheet metal components for captive consumption. Also, they are increasing/extending backward integration and a modern glass toughening plant is being added to cater to the requirements of toughened glass for use in glass cooktops and cooker hoods:

There has been raw material price inflation but they are able to pass on this in the form of price hikes with a lag of 30 to 50 days. More than RM prices, the bigger challenge is around RM availability and backward integration is expected to help overcome this.

They are working on multiple new product launches and they are looking to increase their presence in the cooking appliances market. One such product which they expect to launch in near future is dishwashers (where they expect to price at around Rs 18000 to Rs 22000 per unit). Another potential product they have identified is OTG- oven toaster grillers. Management has clearly explained that the new products will be only those which are import substitutes. These could potentially accelerate revenue growth.

During the recent years, the Company had bought 12175 sq. meters of land on NH73, near Panchkula, Haryana for setting up a new facility where approximately 4500 sq. meters (around 45000 sq. feet) of facilities are already constructed. Another 18000 sq. feet is under construction. The Company shifted all its operations from an earlier facility at Baddi, Himachal Pradesh to this new facility in a phased manner during FY21.

On the corporate governance side (positive), there is an unsecured loan of 5.13 Cr taken by the company from Mr Aditya Kaushik (CMD) and 1.76 Cr from Mr Ashwani Goel (Whole-Time Director)

Importantly, these are interest-free:

As of FY21, total long-term borrowings were 8.9 Cr and out of that 6.88 is unsecured, interest-free from directors.

They recently did preferential issue and some portion of the capital raised was used in debt reduction.

I heard that in the last few years the management even went to Turkey and China to learn the art of the trade. In their investor meeting, the management shared their vision of gaining 35-40% market share by 2026. Their present market share is around 5%. They aspire to produce 1 lakh units of chimneys per month. This would mean Rs 40 Cr monthly revenue from chimneys alone. They have given a guidance for 50 to 70% CAGR in revenue over next 5 to 7 years.

There have been some big changes since the publishing of FY21 AR to now. AR mentioned this production capacity:
image

However, they have discontinued metal cooktops completely and scaled up chimneys massively. The latest currently installed capacity in units per month is 10,000 for Stoves (same as glass cooktops); 5,000 for Hobs; and 20,000 to 22,000 for Cooker Hoods (Chimneys).

Also, earlier, under Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana, the company had marketing agreements with Oil Marketing Companies (HPCL, BPCL and IOCL) to market, sell, distribute and promote LPG Stoves to domestic consumers using their distribution channel. However, they have now discontinued this.

The major risks are intense competition and high debt. One key disconfirming evidence is that for gas stoves they only have 1 customer, hence there is big customer concentration risk. They are planning to add 2-3 more customers for gas stoves soon.

I personally think this is one scenario where it is more about management and narrative. If we just look at RoCE, P&L, margins we will get a false picture because it is currently making losses. Because of the accumulated losses, reserves (hence book value) are very low hence price to book looks very high and debt to equity looks very high. There is no P/E since it is making losses.

The company’s recent investor meeting is available at Passcode Required - Zoom and the passcode is 5Y^.fLq6 (note- this is given on company website IR page and hence is in public domain)

Disclosure: I have a tracking position

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic


StoveKraft - Kitchen Appliances Company

$
0
0

The company was incorporated as Stove Kraft Private Limited in 1999 and converted into a public limited company in 2018.

Industry Overview

The kitchen appliances market comprises instruments or devices designed for smooth functioning of kitchen activities. Kitchen appliances are used mainly for food preparation, cooking, storage and cleaning functions. The Global Kitchen Appliances Market is expected to touch $253.4 billion by 2020, registering a CAGR of 6.4% during the forecast period 2014-2020. The kitchen appliances market can be segmented based on product structure into two categories - ‘Large/Major appliances’ which include refrigerator, dishwasher, microwaves, cooktops, ovens, hobs, and kitchen chimneys; and ‘Small/Minor appliances’ which include food processors, mixer grinders, blenders and juicers, coffee machines, kettles, grills and fryers.

In India, the kitchen appliances industry has traditionally been skewed toward unorganized players while a handful of organized players have dominated major regions and key urban markets. Urban markets account for a major share of total revenues in the consumer durables sector in India whereas rural markets have only now begun to contribute recently. The key ‘Large’ and ‘Small’ cooking appliances categories, the current market value is estimated at about INR 148.5 billion, which is set to reach INR 238.0 billion by end 2022, growing at a CAGR of about 9.9%. Major players currently operating in the Indian kitchen appliances market include TTK Prestige, Stove Kraft Limited, Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd, Hawkins, Bajaj Electricals, Preethi Industries Ltd., Glen, Faber, Kaff Appliances, Inalsa, IFB, Panasonic, and Phillips, etc.

Business

Stove Kraft claims to be one of the leading brands for kitchen appliances in India, and one of the dominant players for pressure cookers and amongst the market leaders in the sale of free-standing hobs and cooktops. It is engaged in the manufacture and retail of a wide and diverse suite of kitchen solutions under Pigeon and Gilma brands, and proposes to commence manufacturing of kitchen solutions under the BLACK + DECKER brand (under brand licensing arrangement with Stanley Black & Decker Inc.), covering the entire range of value, semi-premium and premium kitchen solutions, respectively. Its kitchen solutions comprise of cookware and cooking appliances across our brands, and its home solutions comprise various household utilities, including consumer lighting, which not only enables it to be a one stop shop for kitchen and home solutions, but also offer products at different pricing points to meet diverse customer requirements and aspirations.

Key milestones in the company’s journey are shown below:

The company has two manufacturing facilities, one at Bengaluru and one at Baddi in Himachal Pradesh. 80% of the products sold under the Pigeon & Gilma brands are manufactured in-house, with the rest being sourced from outside. Company has been gradually increasing the share of in-house production and this number is expected to go up even further in future. Both the manufacturing facilities are ISO 9001:2015 certified. The facilities also have a high level of backward integration, with ability to manufacture bakelite handles, critical components, and mould & die in-house. The Bengaluru facility is larger of the two with almost 2/3rd of it available for future expansion. It is an integrated facility comprising of 12 manufacturing units, tailored to manufacture cookware, cooktops, pressure cookers, mixer grinders, non-stick cookware, LED bulbs, floor mops, handy vegetable chopper, IR thermometer and induction cooktops. The installed capacities for each of the products are given in the RHP attached below.

In 2016, the company entered a new segment by launching the Pigeon brand of LED products. Presently, the products sold under the Pigeon LED brand include LED bulbs, battens, and downlights.

Product portfolio

Pressure cookers, mixers & small appliances and non-stick cookware such as frying pans constitute the main sources of revenues for the company. For the half year ended 30-Sep-2022, the revenue of Rs.577 crores was distributed as follows:

Pigeon – targeted at the value / mass market segment - is the flagship brand of the company, comprising around 80% of its total revenue. Product portfolio under the Pigeon brand is given below:

Gilma focuses on the semi-premium customer segment, and is sold exclusively through Gilma branded stores. Gilma portfolio comprises of chimneys, hobs, kitchen sinks and cooktops across price ranges and design offerings. It constitutes around 3% of the company revenues. BLACK + DECKER is a renowned name internationally in the field of, inter alia, kitchen appliances and constitutes another 3 % of the revenues.

Distribution Network

The company sells Pigeon and Black & Decker products through network of distributors and dealers whereas the Gilma products are sold through its own franchisees. The number of retail outlets as on 30-Sep-2020 where the products are available are given below:

image

As of 30-Sep-2021, the number of outlets has increased from 45,540 as on 30-Sep-2020 to 63,428.

Almost 30% of the company’s sales come from online ecommerce channels.

The company also has a dedicated service team and service franchisees to address service calls.

Further, the Pigeon products are also sold in over 10 countries internationally, including the U.S., U.K. and Mexico. Around 9 % of the company’s revenues come from exports.

Management & Promoter Group

The founder of the Company, Rajendra Gandhi, is a first-generation entrepreneur with over 21 years of experience in the kitchen appliances and home appliances industry. Wholetime director and CEO, Rajiv Mehta was the managing director of Puma Sports India Private Limited and has previously worked with Arvind Limited.

As on March 31, 2021, the Company had 3,312 employees on its payroll.

Financial Information

The company showed losses till 2018 but has staged a smart turnaround thereafter. Brief financials of the business are given below:

EBIDTA margins for H1 FY22 were 11.4% but the company has been maintaining that around 13-14% margins are achievable in the long run.

Due to the past history of accumulated losses, company had a tax shield till Q1 FY22. For the full year FY22, company states profits above Rs.40 crores will become taxable, giving an effective tax rate of around 14% for the year (estimated). From FY23 onwards, the company will be liable for the full corporate tax rate of 25%.

Operating efficiency has been good, and consistently improving. Working capital days have reduced to just 23 days as of end-Sep 22, and outstanding debt is just a little over Rs.50 crore from more than Rs.300 crore a year or two earlier. Part of the debt reduction was on account of conversion of CCDs into equity, however. Company will soon become debt free. Company uses channel funding programme to manage its working capital, without recourse to the company.

The company claims a ROCE of 33.6 % and an ROE of 21.6 %.

Deloitte Haskins & Sells are the statutory auditors.

Risk Factors

In general, kitchen appliances is a very competitive field since the products are low on technological sophistication and does not require heavy capital investment. Hence margins are low and companies need to constantly innovate and bring out newer and newer products into the market. Companies also need to spend a lot on advertising, promotions and brand building.

The primary raw materials for the company are steel and aluminium, and is to that extent exposed to commodity price risk. Cost of Goods Sold comprises of around 65% of revenues for the last 12 months.

Besides the usual business risk factors, we find that the company has an ongoing dispute with Pigeon Appliances Pvt Ltd (PAPL), an associate company where the promoter Mr. Rajendra Gandhi is a Director. PAPL is a defunct company which has not filed its financials with the RoC for several years, and is facing the risk of being struck off the government’s company database. It has one more director besides Mr. Gandhi, who is not co-operating due to which there is an impasse. If the matter is eventually decided against Mr. Gandhi, he runs the risk of becoming ineligible to occupy the post of Director in any company, which will adversely affect Stove Kraft. The matter is currently deadlocked and stuck in litigation. Details of the case are given in the RHP.

Under its brand license agreement with Black & Decker, the company is required to achieve a certain minimum number of sales, failing which B & D may terminate the agreement. However, details of how much these sales are is not clear.

New initiatives

Recently, company has announced an entry into electric switches and accessories segment through acquisition of business of Bengaluru-based Skava Electric Pvt Limited through slump sale for a consideration of Rs.4 crores. This will help the company foray into the business of manufacturing low voltage switchgear solutions like electrical switches, sockets, distribution boxes, switch boards, M.C.B, bulb holders, etc. For FY21, Skava recorded revenues of Rs.10 crores.

Company has also announced foray into Branded Modular Kitchen Segment. In a press release, the company said a Pigeon Ready-to-assemble (RTA) kitchen with plywood kitchen cabinets, granite top, kitchen sink, chimney, cooktop & accessories shall be available to the customer from April 2022 at an all delivered starting price of Rs.69,990/-.

Listing and thereafter

In Jan 2021, the company made IPO of 1.07 crore equity Shares at Rs.385 per Equity Share of the face value of Rs. 10 each which includes a fresh issue of 24.68 lac shares and an Offer For Sale of 82.50 lac shares. The stock listed on 5-Feb-2021 at Rs.498 on the NSE and is currently trading at Rs.980.05 as on date of writing 13-Jan-2021.

Valuation

Due to the tax shield available to the company (as explained earlier) in the current year, profits are presently overstated. I have therefore ignored the P/E ratio and done comparative valuation based on Price to Sales and EV / EBIDTA which is given below:

Based on the above, stock is trading at less than 3 X Price to Sales and 25 X EV / EBIDTA which is middle of the range compared to peers.

Sources of information: RHP, Annual Reports, Company Presentation, Quarterly results, Analyst Concalls

Links:

Red Herring Prospectus
Annual Report for FY2021
Company Website
Skava Business Acquisition
Foray into branded Modular Kitchen segment

Disclosure: Analyzing, no positions at the moment.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Ksolves - a newage software development firm

$
0
0

Overall macro trends in IT industry - Software development firms offering IT services while transitioning from old technologies to new technologies/offerings such as Big Data, AI/ML, Blockchain, Cloud, Edge computing, IOT, SaaS/PaaS/IaaS, RPA, BPM etc. All of which come under one big umbrella of digitization.

As per Gartner, " Digitalization is the use of digital technologies to change a business model and provide new revenue and value-producing opportunities; it is the process of moving to a digital business."

Traditionally, Indian pure play software services firms hold office spaces (real estate) on their books while MNC hold office spaces on lease basis that keeps them nimble. The advent of Covid
has only helped accelerate the trend towards being asset light if the transition from CAPEX to OPEX at customers end (due to cloud/saas) was not enough. While this transition in large IT firms will be a gradual shift, the hybrid model works best today for companies of all sizes.

Having said the above, there are companies today that truly operate with a global delivery model with no/very small office space (sales office). Needless to say that being asset light, helps companies command a higher OPM.

Ksolves seems to be just there offering services in software development and software products. Below in an excerpt from the annual report of FY21: -

While, at one hand, the company has partnered with some of the most prominent and largely used software products across the globe such as Salesforce CRM, Magento, Drupal CMS and Odoo that helps stay relevant and garner a constant source of income, on the other hand, it has its own product “Dashboard Ninja” and a few other products/themes on its webstore and on Odoo store that have earned good traction globally. Moreover, the company has also partnered with some of the prominent online marketplaces to attract talent. Furthernore, the projects/services offered to clients seems solely on T&M basis.

The main promoters of the company are Mr. Ratan Srivastava (around 15 years of IT experience) and Mrs. Deepali Verma (around 7 years of IT experience) with the board getting reconstituted in the last couple of years. The CEO, Mr. Ratan seems to strive towards being industry relevant and nimble footed to the changing dynamics with underlying risk protection, which gets corroborated by the below details from the AR and investor presentation: -

Top 5 clients contribute 45% of the revenue. 85% customer stickiness

Link to the investor presentation deck: -

How the story unfolds and whether the management walks the talk is to be seen in the coming years.

opinions/comments/questions/additions invited.

P.S. This is not to be treated/construed as buy/sell recommendation.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

CONCOR, Leader in containerised freight transport

$
0
0

Business introduction -

CONCOR being a market leader in containerised rail freight transport it is now having the largest network of 60 ICDs/CFSs in India (58 terminals and 3 strategic tie-ups). In addition to providing inland transport by rail for containers, it has also expanded to cover management of Ports, air cargo complexes and establishing cold-chain.

It has and will continue to play the role of promoting containerization in India by virtue of its modern rail wagon fleet, customer friendly commercial practices and extensively used Information Technology. The company developed multimodal logistics support for India’s International and Domestic containerization and trade. Though rail is the main stay of our transportation plan, road services and also provided to cater to the need of door-to-door services, whether in the International or Domestic business.

Moat :-
Concor is having moat of having terminals and ICD at advantage location which connects various rail routes. Replicating the business model would be very difficult. Acquiring land and constructing a new rail terminal is very tough for a private player to compete

Opportunity -
Privatisation and Dedicated freight corridor

Business model advantage -
✓High Margin
✓Relatively low cost for operation (huge cost involved at the beginning for setting up the terminal)
✓Disruption free business

Risk -
Government policies

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Dhunseri Ventures - An MF with a business or vice versa. - PET, BoPET and Investments ! and

$
0
0

TL;DR; - Deeply undervalued business which has its own mutual fund (effectively), with a second line of business opening up.

Note - there is a thread on Dhunseri Petrochem but that no firm no longer exists.

Okay, Came across this really odd firm. Well, odd suite of firms, really. Welcome to the Dhunseri group.

The Dhunseri Group has 4 listed businesses, each trading below book value. All of them pay dividends regularly. Not a big dividend, but it’s there.

  • Naga Dhunseri Group Ltd - CMP 1469, BV - 6268, ROE/ROCE - 13, PEG-0.05, Trading Volume - Almost Non-existent . The original Company, Naga Hills Tea Co. Ltd. , a Public Limited Company was incorporated on 26th day of August,1918 under the Companies Act,1913. The Company was acquired by Dhunseri Group and the name was changed to Naga Dhunseri Holding Group Ltd. on 17th day of September,1990 (from website). However, No volumes, No real business. Just net worth.

  • Dhunseri Investments - CMP 758, BV 4673, ROCE-19, ROE-9, PEG-0.07, Trading Volume - Non-existent. Dhunseri Investments Limited is an Investment Company registered with Reserve Bank of India as Non-Banking Financial Company (from website). Again No volumes, No real business. Just net worth.

  • Dhunseri Tea & Industries Ltd - CMP 309, BV-857, ROCE/ROE 4-6, PEG-0.5, Trading are usually in low thousands/ten thousands, but shoots up occasionally. Enough for a small retail investor to enter and exit. This has a viable tea business. Issue is, I don’t really see the tea business as going places. So not investment grade.

So we come to the last one, the one this thread is about -

  • Dhunseri Ventures - CMP 283, BV 534, ROCE/ROE - 16/18, PEG 0.03, Liquidity More than enough, Probably enough for a large to very large retail as well.

Dhunseri Ventures

  • Dhunseri Ventures is into the PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) resin business. It is the second largest PET resin manufacturer in India after Reliance and one of the top ten in the world (as per their website). What is interesting about the company is in their current numbers -

https://www.screener.in/company/DVL/consolidated/

Especially check the P&L and Balance Sheet sections.

  • The firm reported an EPS of 66 in FY 21, and 96 TTM.
  • The firm has treasury investments worth 1887 Cr while its Market Cap is 980 odd Cr. (Will come to this again).
  • The sales and profit numbers are a bit difficult to reconcile (at my capability level), but the firm has recently divested a large stake in a non-related subsidiary - Tastetaria Foods, so some numbers are probably coming in from there.
  • I could not find any significant promoter reputation issues in my searches.

Ownership -

  • 75% of the company is held by promoters and other Promoter group entities. 25% by public. New India Assurance company owns 2%. WBIDC holds 2%. For a firm based in West Bengal, seeing government ownership is a small relief.

Subsidiaries -

  • Dhunseri Infrastructure - Developing an IT park in Kolkata. This pretty much looks like a write-off.
  • Twelve Cupcakes - Profitable bakery chain in Singapore.

Joint Ventures -

  • IVL Dhunseri Petrochem Industries Private Limited (IDPIL) -
    50% JV with Indorama Ventures Thailand, World’s largest producer of PET resins. This contributes to the working PET business. Selling the products across the globe in 55 countries under the Trademarks owned by IVL-RAMAPET and DVL-ASPET. It has two PET resin plants in Haldia with a capacity of 4,80,000 TPA and one plant in Haryana with an effective capacity of 2,16,000 TPA.

  • IVL Dhunseri Polyester Company S.A.E
    Again, 50% JV with Indorama Ventures Thailand. For a plant located at Ain Sokhna Free trade zone in Egypt for PET facility with a capacity of 5,40,000 TPA. Dhunseri Ventures says this tie up was to bring the Egypt firm back online. I cannot figure out whether this plant is currently operational or not.
    Links -
    Indorama Ventures to Support Manufacturing Revival in Egypt. | Indorama Ventures (dated 2018).

Note on Indorama Ventures - World’s largest PET resin firm.
wikipedia - Indorama Ventures - Wikipedia
main website - Indorama Ventures
awards and recognitions - Corporate Level | Indorama Ventures

Key trigger -
Dhunseri Ventures is currently in the process of setting up a 45,000 tonnes BoPET (biaxially-oriented polyethylene terephthalate made from stretched PET) per annum (TPA) with a target of increasing it to 1,60,000 tonnes by 2026-27. Bopet is a key material in the flexible packaging space and has good demand in the upcoming 5-8 year time frame. Initially raw materials are planned to be backward integrated with its own PET plants.

From what I can find out, this work is ongoing and not just hot air -

http://bwlegalworld.businessworld.in/article/Khaitan-Co-Acts-As-Legal-Counsel-For-Dhunseri-Group-In-INR-1250-Crore-Poly-Film-Factory-Project-At-Panagarh/20-09-2021-405219/.

The company expects a turnover of ₹1,500 crore from the flexible film business by 2026 and export of around ₹400 crore. Current total sales of company on screener is - 218Cr. That’s a 7x growth in top-line in 5 years.

Treasury Investments.
There is a very good investor at work behind the scenes in this firm. Find screenshot of current holdings. (There’s more in the non-current section).

image

That, is an excellent set of investments, imho.

Risks
There is a bunch of complex holding structure between group entities and other entities controlled by promoters.
There are loans to the promoters, from foreign subsidiaries, at incredible low rates. Just parking the same money in Indian FDs would give a 2% spread.

Conclusion.

  • Overall while the company does favor promoters over shareholders, it’s has been paying dividends consistently.
  • Current businesses seem operational and profitable.
  • Company net worth and investments are impressive, so loss of capital seems unlikely.
  • Except for usual promoter loans - there does not seem to be big red flags in governance - but I’m no expert and help here would be appreciated.
  • The Bopet investment, if it materializes, looks likely to create disproportionate value, over and above the current book value discount.

Would appreciate inputs from senior investors and VP members in analysis and thrashing out any risks and dangers which I may have missed.

Note - If duplicate thread, can someone point me to the right one. Would be happy to close this and add to existing thread.

Disclosure - Invested, 2% initial position.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Olectra Greentech - Electric Bus Opportunity

$
0
0

Background

Goldstone Infratech Limited is registered in the year 2000 with their only product segment as electric insulators. The company got listed in the stock exchanges in the year 2002.The promoter group is Trinity Infraventures limited who are also promoters of Goldstone Technologies which is another listed company in India.

The company started electric buses division in 2015 having a strong partnership tie-up in India with Warren Buffet backed BYD Auto from China.BYD is a pioneer in EV battery space and has a significant presence in EV ecosystem right from rechargeable batteries to electric buses, trucks, cars etc.As per Wikipedia BYD page - As of 2021, BYD Auto is the world’s second largest New Energy Vehicles carmaker in the world, with 329,408 units sold in January-September 2021

In the year 2018, the company’s name is changed to Olectra Greentech, and MEIL Holdings, which is a subsidiary of MEIL(Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Limited) company came up with open offer and increased stake in Olectra. At the moment, MEIL Holdings hold more than 50% stake in Olectra making it a subsidiary and all the previous promoter group entities have reduced their stake.
My understanding is, there was an unwritten agreement between the old and new promoters that the old promoters have to completely exit Olectra once new management takes over.

The new promoter group(MEIL) is one of the biggest and successful infra player in India and have been regularly featuring in the top 100 of Hurun India Rich list.

The bet on Olectra is primarily a bet on the E-Bus segment which has huge opportunity. The revenue growth in insular division is minimal from past 10 years.

Electric Bus

Industry Structure and Development:

The oath taken for Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Buses in India by NITI Aayog in 2017-18 through Department of Heavy Industries (DHI) has initially launched, FAME I scheme, facilitating “Capital Subsides” for 560 of Electric Buses has given encouragement to State Transport Undertakings (STUs) in 11 Indian cities, to own the EV Buses in their fleet, and their long awaited desire to operate and witness the performance of Electric Buses became a reality in India with the subsidy support provided .The Succeeding FAME II scheme notified in 2019-20 was initially aimed to deploy 5595 no. of E Buses in various STUs under Gross Cost Contract (GCC) Operational model, which has attracted attention of 64 cities to deploy Electric Buses without any investment from STUs. In 2020-21, DHI has sanctioned subsidies for additional 670 Buses. GCC model has enabled Private investments in this sector and STUs thus need not facilitate any finance arrangements for the After-subsidy costs of Electric Buses.

Since the deployment of Electric Buses under GCC Operational model is for the first time in India, STUs have taken some time to understand the technical feasibility, financial viability, economic feasibility and Operational compatibility of E-Buses, including Routes and Schedules management. Early deployment of E Buses under Operational Model in cities like Pune has given tremendous insights, analysis and study practices to all the other STUs in India. Delay in understanding the EV technology and viability factors has led to conclude projects in snail pace. The successful deployment of Electric Buses in GCC model has ignited the momentum in EV Bus adoption in India. Despite non-operation of Public Transport during COVID Wave I & II, Department of Heavy Industries – DHI along with State Transport Undertakings - STUs, and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) have successfully implemented FAME II.

More than 1000 electric buses are running across the country with an additional 2600 electric bus orders are in execution stage under FAME -2 scheme. Accordingly, DHI has extended the FAME II scheme validity till 31st March 2024 for a period of additional 3 Years from 1st April 2021 It is also understood that in India that STUs having deployed Electric Buses with Longer Range have been be progressive in their next set of deployment. The COVID-19 crisis will create many new challenges for this sector, especially in urban areas and intercity segments with high travel demand. Finally, the vision of NITI Aayog that only electric vehicles should be sold in India after 2030 would result in a reduction of 156 million tons in Diesel and Petrol consumption with net saving of roughly Rs. 3.9 Lakh Crore by 2030 at present oil prices.

Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report
The management discussion and analysis section starting from page 90 to 95 in the 2021 annual report is worth reading to understand the complete context

Main Products/Segments


Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report



Source for the images above – Company’s Investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Main Markets/Customers

The State Transport Corporations(SRTUs) are the main customers for Olectra. Olectra is the market leader in electric buses in India.


Source for the image above – Company’s Investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Current Market/Industry Trends

Outlook

Electric Bus market is expected to grow rapidly in India considering various factors like hikes in Diesel prices, Diesel fleet purchase holiday during COVID-19 impact, EV Policies across country, State Government commitment to EV adoption,Grid balancing factors and Power surplus States, Lesser Bus ratio vs 1000 Population, etc., NITI Aayog has mandated aggregation of demand for 5,500 Electric Buses in India through Convergence Energy Services Limited (CESL) and World Resources Institute(WRI) , for which the process has already begun by CESL.

Diesel prices in India have been hiked 69 times in this Year, which is expected to be further increased. Huge financial impact is seen on the Public Transport Undertakings fleet operations with the increased diesel prices. Hikes in Fuel costs are one major factor that been shift Diesel to Electric. The said hikes are also impacting the Total Cost of Ownership for Diesel fueled Buses. The current Climate Policy in India is rightly addressing the challenges of electric buses and providing an environment to accelerate their adoption and implementation.

This current trend of increase in Diesel prices, seems consistent and expected to continue. Diesel Fuel cost is contributing to 40% of CPK in Mofussil NonAC Buses and 50% in AC Intercity Buses. Public and Private Transport fleet expected an early adoption with faster growth compared to previous Years adoption.

CESL entry into E Bus aggregation in India will further improve the Market opportunities as CESL will be acting as Aggregator between STUs, Operators and OEMs. CESL main focus is to aggregate the demand in 9 cities taking into consideration Public Transport, Last Mile connectivity for Metro, Airport Tarmac Electric fleet, etc., In the FAME II Phase I Scheme, a New Segments like Intercity deployment has successfully taken off in form of concluding contracts by MSRTC, KSRTC and APSRTC.

Last Mile connectivity Project has also been initiated by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation – DMRC under FAME II Scheme. Opportunities in the form of Metro Neo projects in India will further open a new segment for Electric Buses. Few Green fund agencies are also aggressively preparing their strategies to deploy Electric Buses in India for Private Sector deployment.

Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report


Many states have got their EV policy draft ready.

Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Bullish Viewpoints

  • Gross Cost Contract model will solve the biggest problem of SRTUs - huge Capex front load is no longer a viable option especially with many years of losses
    • The cost of operational costs and maintenance of electric buses is very less compared to diesel and CNGs

Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

  • Well placed to attract ESG investors and Green funds
  • Government of India wants to reduce dependency on Oil and so pushing EVs, eventually pushing for only EVs after 2030
  • Leader in securing the orders and first mover advantage having operations from 2017. At the moment, they have a market share of ~40% of electric bus orders in India
  • The opportunity size is huge as the bet is not just on the Electric Bus alone as its future plans include manufacture of Trucks, LCVs, 3 wheeler’s etc


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Bearish Viewpoints

  • Technology rests with BYD and BYD can start its operations in India on its own. They already have their plant in Chennai and were planning to venture into categories other than Electric buses on their own previously.
    • The mitigation to this is to have an exclusive partnership similar to Maruti-Suzuki model. At the moment, BYD Auto has zero stake in Olectra shares.
  • BYD being from China can affect company’s prospects adversely due to sentiments at border
  • Inherent risk of damages to public property (incl buses) in exceptional situations likes riots
  • Regulatory risk as government can enforce new policy unfavourable to EVs or delay EV adoption to save existing industry like postponing scrappage policy
  • The target customer market segment is government backed State Road Transport Undertakings(SRTUs) and B2G segment is very tough nut to crack
    • The new promoters (MEIL) are well known for executing government projects(50% of order book) and have a successful track record of completing big projects
  • Electric Bus technology is relatively new and we don’t know all the risks associated with it
  • Promoter is new to bus industry and the other competitors like Tata Motors, Ashok Leyland, JBM Auto are well entrenched in this industry from long
  • Currently, government is supporting EV push by giving subsidies in the form of FAME-I and FAME-2, no idea whether they will continue to support
    • However, with Gross Cost Contract(GCC) model, there is no CAPEX load on SRTUs
  • The cost of battery(Lithium Ion) is around 40 to 50% of the overall cost of the electric bus. Any significant increase in the price of Lithium will adversely impact the sustainability of the business model
    • China has 12.2% of world’s lithium production in 2020


Source – Trading Economics

  • Elon Musk. No idea, what are his plans in electric bus space or even new battery technology

Interesting Viewpoints

  • Olectra is either in trails or presence in 40 STUs


    Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

  • Promoter is not just looking at Public Transport but other adjacencies like inter-city/inter-state, private transport segment and also into TARMAC buses in Airport


    Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Barriers to Entry

  • There are almost no barriers to entry
  • The target customer segment is State Road Transport Undertakings and dealing with government organisations is very difficult
  • Olectra is the only company giving more than 250 kms for single charge. This is a great barrier especially if one is interested to run inter-city buses
    • If I remember correctly, Ashok Leyland uses replaceable batteries to mitigate this risk
  • To execute GCC contracts of bigger scale and long payback periods, you need to have very good money muscle and so smaller players may not be able to compete

Business Model

Olectra has BYD as the technology partner which basically provides the most important components of electric bus like battery and technology.

Olectra mostly does the assembling of parts. Usually, the cost of electric bus will be in the range of 1 to 2.5 crores.

The most important target customer segment for electric bus is SRTUs and they are all usually running in operational losses.

This is where Gross Cost Contract model will help as SRTUs don’t need to do Capex but agree on paying bus operators with price per km.

This model is already operational in some diesel buses and compared to diesel buses, the cost per km is very less for electric buses.


Holding Structure

Evey Trans which is a subsidiary of MEIL Holdings, buys electric buses from Olectra and creates Special Purpose Vehicles(SPV) for each Gross Cost Contract(GCC).

Hence, you see many related party transactions. I just mentioned only two in the above structure


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 15.09.2021

Valuation Model

The bet on Olectra is basically a bet on the number of E-buses it sells.



Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Based on my back of the envelope calculations – Olectra delivered 120 E-buses in Q3 FY22 so far

  • Order Book on 08.11 – 1450
  • Order Book on 09.11 – 1550
  • Fresh Order on – 01.12 – 100
  • Order Book on 01.12 – (1550+100) – 1650
  • Order Book after deliveries made on – 01.12 – 1530

So, 120(1650-1530) E-buses have been delivered in Q3 FY22 so far. This itself generates revenue far greater than H1 FY22(29 buses) ~ 234 crores(1.95 Cr as average bus price)

Olectra is a growing company and we are currently at the start of EV bus adoption. The below analysis shows the opportunity ahead.


Source – Company’s investor presentation dated 09.11.2021

Considering that Olectra is able to get 5% of 200,000 buses – it will translate to 10,000 buses per year. Let’s say, we consider the average price of Olectra bus as 1 crore, it will translate to 10,000 crores.

Olectra is currently having a market cap of ~7,000 crores. It will translate to Price/Sales of less than 1. The estimates provided do not include other adjacencies like Trucks, LCVs and 3-Wheelers etc

If the question is whether the company is really prepared for manufacture of 10,000 buses per year, I think yes. I have been hearing about this number from at least 2 years.

The recent land acquisition of 150 acres in Telangana substantiates the conviction that company is moving in the same direction.

Corporate Governance Scan

  • Promoter cancelled 91,00,000 convertible Warrants on 10.04.2020 during peak of covid which were allotted on 10.10.2018. The subscription amount received at the time of allotment of warrants was forfeited
    • The main reason is due to the fact that the share price was way below compared to the warrants price of 175 rupees per share
    • However, they increased the stake in multiple tranches recently at around 400
  • The previous promoter was not known for best corporate governance practices
    • The new Promoter is now having more than 50% stake in Olectra and the earlier promoter sold most of their stake
  • MEIL itself wants to list their company in next 1 or 2 years. After they taken over Olectra, there is a significant improvement in their disclosures and investor relations
    • Olectra website is showing all kinds of transparency in disclosures.
    • I believe, they will stick to their highest corporate governance standards at least till the IPO of their flagship company

Forensic Scan/Red Flags

  • MD Salary ~2 Crores. PBT ~8.44 for H1 FY22. Annualizing it to 16.88 which means ~11%
  • As it is a growing company with much growth expected in future, the salary doesn’t seem to be a red flag
  • No Stock options offered to MD which means no “Skin in the game”
  • Subsidiary Evey Trans was sold to parent company MEIL Holdings. The reason for this transfer is to ensure that the promoter will shell out the money to buy buses from Olectra and in the process, de-risk the financial liability
  • There is a risk of related party amounts between the promoter entities. This will be majorly with Evey Trans which buys the buses from Olectra. Having a tab on Cashflow will help in identifying in any lapses of payment


Source – Company’s 2021 Annual Report

Resources

The opportunity is similar to how Jio disrupted telecom. There is neither past baggage nor debt and incumbents have debt and incumbents will also need to work on their existing services.

The other advantage is Olectra has the edge in technology in terms of electric bus among the existing competitors.

The promoter has the money muscle, best technology partner(BYD) and all he needs to do is hire/nurture best talent.

Can Olectra disrupt the bus industry like how its promoter MEIL did in infra? Only time will tell.

Looking forward to the views of other investors.

Disclosure(s) – Invested 6% of PF and biased. Actively tracking from 2018.

14 posts - 6 participants

Read full topic

Par Drugs & Chemicals Ltd

$
0
0

Overview
Par Drugs & Chemicals makes API’s & Fine Chemicals for domestic as well as Exports Market

Business
They have 2 business verticals namely - APIs & Fine Chemicals. 72% of Revenue comes from APIs & rest 28% from Fine Chemicals

APIs

In APIs the company makes APIs for Formulation Manufacturers. For example when a drug is formed their are many steps to it. First is KSM which is key starting material then comes your intermediate after that API and then at the end comes Formulation which is also called Finished Dosage.

It has entire range of Antacid Molecules. Antacid Means a medicine that prevents Acidity. Currently they have around 18 APIs molecules , As follows-

The company is one of the largest manufacturer in Magnesium Hydroxide, Sucralfate and
Magnesium Trisilate in India. Their uses are stated above in the Image. So basically they are a End-to-End Antacid Solution Provider. With many APIs that cater to same segment.

Fine Chemicals

Coming to Fine Chemicals. Unlike APIs fine chemicals have uses in many Sectors such as Pharmaceuticals, Adhesives , Agricultural etc etc

Currently company has around 10 fine chemicals portfolio, Which looks like this -

As you can see they have variety of uses

Capacity

Company has around 9,700 MT Capacity in Bhavnagar for APIs, Fine Chemicals & Magnesium Hydroxide.


Company also doing a 1,400 MTPA Brownfiled CAPEX in 2021 , which will add put to their capacity

Customers

Company caters to around 132 Customers & Added 20 New Customers in FY21 .Its key customers include Essential Drugs Company, Pfizer, United Phosphorus, Cipla.

R&D

The company mentioned that its R&D Team is focusing on Chronic therapies like
antidepressants, anti-diabetic and anti-bacterial. This shows that they are also entering newer & newer Therapeutic Segments & Expanding their Product Portfolio.

Financials

Financials as such looks good in FY21 Numbers -

EBITDA Margin - 26%

PAT Margin - 19%

ROCE - 22%

Risks

Risks in this business can be -

  • Over Dependency on Antacid Products
  • Lack of Execution of Management in terms of diversifying Product Portfolio & Capacity Expansion

Here were my 2 Cents of the company. Thanks for reading & Giving your valuable time

Sources used in this Thread was Investor Presentation of the Company.

Link for it is this -

2 posts - 2 participants

Read full topic

CG Power & Industrial Solutions Ltd - Capable management, good business & supportive industry tailwinds

$
0
0

Background
CG Power & Industrial Solutions Ltd (CG Power) is a leading capital goods & engineering company with a diverse portfolio of products across electric motors, railways, transformers, switchgears, drives & automation segments. The company’s products mainly find application in industrial, railway and power sectors.

The company was positioned among top 1-5 players in majority of its product segments. However, it was loosing market share due to lack of management focus, fraudulent activities by its erstwhile promoter’s (Avantha group) and subsequent fund crunch.

CG Power’s lenders-initiated steps under RBI’s Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets, leading to Tube Investments of India Limited (TI), a listed company and part of the Murugappa Group acquiring a controlling stake (~53%) in November 2020. TI has infused about Rs.7 bn of equity, besides also subscribing to certain warrants.

Post takeover by TI, a new board has been constituted under the leadership of Mr S. Vellayan (Chairman) and Mr Natrajan Srinivasan (MD), settlement of old lenders has been done, recasting of previous years’ financials has been carried out and liquidation/divestment process of certain overseas subsidiaries has been initiated. Performance is back on track with PBT of Rs.215 crore achieved in H1FY22 as against management’s initial indicative target of about Rs.500 crore of PBT in next 4-5 years.

Business Overview

Historically, about 65-70% of revenue was contributed from domestic markets and rest was from international operations. However, majority of overseas subsidiaries have been liquidated or in the process of liquidation. Now with just 2 operating overseas subsidiaries; about 90% of revenue is from domestic operations.

CG Power re-launched its Fast-Moving Electrical Goods (FMEG) range of products in 2019 such as domestic & agricultural Pumps, and industrial & domestic Exhaust Fans, but the contribution is insignificant. Now, the company has serious plan for the segment and preparing to extend FMEG product range, including ceiling fans.

There is renewed focus on R&D and a number of new products have been developed, EV Motor being most significant one. Details of few such products are as following

Management
Tube Investments of India Limited (TI), a listed company and part of the Murugappa Group now holds ~53% stake in the company, besides certain warrants. Murugappa Group, Headquartered in Chennai, is an Indian conglomerate founded in 1900 and having presence in several segments including engineering, abrasives, auto components, bicycles, sugar, farm inputs, fertilizers, NBFC, Insurance and financial services. Mr. M A M Arunachalam is Chairman and Mr S Vellayan is MD of Tube Investments.
Mr S Vellayan is appointed as Chairman and Mr Natrajan Srinivasan as MD of CG Power.

Growth Triggers
• CG Power has eight decades of lineage with leadership position in many product categories. Strength of its product portfolio is evident from the fact that it was able to sell its products despite significant internal challenges and acute funding crunch during the last few years. Now, with a new promoter group and management team having clear focus on gaining lost ground, expanding product portfolio and range; business performance should improve significantly.

• Focus on R&D, industrial automation, EV motors, FMEG products, application & geographical expansion, improving capacity utilisation are management identified areas to drive revenue and profitability growth. Also, selling of identified non-core assets and FCF generation should help the company in becoming debt free in 2-3 years.

• Industry tailwind are conducive. After a subdued scenario during past many years; capital goods sector is seeing initial signs of recovery. Government impetus on manufacturing through PLI schemes, modernisation initiatives in railways & power sector, private capex driven by improving capacity utilisation and export opportunities, provide visibility for long-term uptrend in the sector.

• New management team has a proven track record. Mr Vellayan has been associated with Murugappa group since 2010 is credited for improved performance of Cholamandalam Investment and Finance as well as Tube Investments. Mr. Natarajan Srinivasan has also been associated with Murugappa group for last 15 years.

• For TI and CG Power’s future business strategy, the group is inspired by a very successful American company, Danaher Corporation; which has a successful track record of acquiring many entities and generating above average returns for shareholders. The management plans to replicate the same under TI as well as CG Power and use these companies as a platform for growth through acquisitions. Besides, there is stated intent of improving revenue growth & profitability, focus on cash flows, improving return on capital employed and pare debt.

• While the management was targeting Rs.5000 crore of turnover and Rs.500 crore of PBT in next 5 years, they seem to be much ahead on the target. During H1FY22, CG Power reported revenue of Rs.2504 crore and PBT (before exceptional items) of Rs.215 crore. With the legacy issues already fixed; enhanced product portfolio, operational efficiencies and industry tailwinds should help in achieving better earnings going forward.

Key Risks
• The Company had received notice of demand under Income Tax Act for Rs.606.30 crores for FY17. While the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has granted interim stay until admission of appeal before the High Court, it remains a major contingent liability.

• There are ongoing investigations by SFIO, ED and CBI pertaining to acts of erstwhile promoter & previous management and the company is also a party in this investigation. The Company believes that the Company or the present Board of Directors and Key Managerial Personnel appointed after the change of Management on 26 November, 2020, cannot be made liable for any violations in respect of certain past. However, risk of any unforeseen development remains.

• One lender has invoked the corporate guarantee amounting to Rs.41.56 crore due to bankruptcy proceedings initiated of Belgium Entities. The Company has not made provision towards this invocation on the assumption that the estimated recoverable value of assets of Belgium entities shall be sufficient to meet this liability.

• Successful expansion of product portfolio and favourable industry environment are key to expected superior growth prospects. Any disappointment on the same can have significant impact on the performance.

• Once CG Power becomes debt free, management has stated plans of driving growth through acquisitions. Acquisitions carry certain amount of risk pertaining to business as well as integration. Nevertheless, competent management with a track record provides comfort.

• Steep increase in commodity prices led by lag in pricing action has impacted the margins by about 2-3% during H1FY222. Large transformer orders have price variation clause, however smaller distribution products or industrial products do not have such clauses. Thus, the company is exposed to the risk of any sudden or steep increase in input prices.

• While probability for most of above-mentioned risks significantly impacting the business is low, however they cannot be completely ruled out.

Financials

• I have not shown historical financials as the company was in a different trajectory during last few years. Also, YoY performance is not comparable due to severe fund crunch impacting operations during H1FY21.
• As visible above, CG Power has reported impressive performance during the first 2 quarters of FY22.
• Exceptional items majorly pertain to cessation of liabilities due to settlement/restructuring of past borrowings, provision for past corporate guarantees and other provision reversals etc.
• Apart from good P&L performance, cash flow generation was also strong with OCF of Rs.177 crore and FCF of Rs.140 crore in H1FY22. Debt level came down by about Rs.3 bn in H1FY22 and net debt stands at about Rs.7 bn now.

Valuation

Stock has multiplied from a low witnessed in the phase when the company had bankruptcy risk and post management change also; as no one had expected such fast and significant turnaround. At the CMP of Rs.178, market cap is Rs.240 bn and diluted market cap (on conversion of warrants) is around Rs.272 bn. At the annualised PBT of Rs.430 crore (H1FY22 x 2), stock is trading at about 63x. I have used PBT due to significant amount of one-offs and income tax is majorly deferred tax during H1FY22. One of the leading broking firms estimates PAT of more than Rs.7 bn in FY24, which gives forward PE of 39x.

Capital goods majors such as ABB, Honeywell, Siemens, Thermax are trading between 40-65x FY24 estimated earnings. While these multiples optically look high, there could be earning surprises as witnessed during previous capital goods up-cycle during 2003-2008 (led by high revenue growth and margin expansion).

While the turnaround as well as near term performance appear to be already discounted; compounding of earnings which can happen over a period under the capable new leadership is probably not discounted. An investor should look forward for only this now.

Philip Fisher writes “In evaluating a common stock, the management is 90%, the industry is 9% and all other factors are 1%”. Only time will tell if CG Power is a perfect 100% combo of this.

Disc: Invested. I am not SEBI registered Advisor/Analyst. The information provided above is for education purpose only.

2 posts - 1 participant

Read full topic


BCL - Ethanol Story Pick

$
0
0

The India ethanol story can be played through a builder like Praj Industries or sugar molasses companies or the grain alcohol companies. Amongst the grain alcohol companies 4 come to mind Globus Spirits, BCL Industries, Gulshan Polyols or Coastal Corporation.

Company Background
BCL is a part of the Mittal Group founded in 1976, by Late Shri D. D. Mittal. Under the stewardship of Mr. Rajinder Mittal, the company has now grown into an Rs1400crs business empire.

Promoter stake at 61.36% with skin in the game

The company is a diversified conglomerate in manufacturing and development with business interests spread across a variety of industry verticals namely Edible Oil and Vanaspati, Distillery and Real Estate.

Distillery business
BCL entered into the distillery business mainly to diversify away from edible oil business. The company mainly produced grain-based Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA). Apart from being used in alcoholic beverages, ENA is also used in cosmetics and personal care products like perfumes, toiletries and pharmaceutical products such as antiseptics, drugs, syrups, etc. The company has developed long term relationships with clients like Pernod Ricard, Radico Khaitan, Punjab Chemicals and Crop protection limited and Wonder healthcare. The company had also launched 8 different Liquor brands like Asli Santra, Ranjha Sanufi and Red Royal Whisky.

The company distillery can also manufacture Ethanol along with ENA. After the launch of the Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) program the company converted 130 KLPD of its existing capacity into production of Ethanol.

Oil marketing companies (OMCs) have recently allocated BCL to supply 36mn liters of ethanol from its manufacturing unit at Bathinda. Further, the company has also applied for additional quantity of 5 million liters. The total sellable quantity to OMC’s will be 41mn liters for the period from 01st Dececmber, 2021 till 30th November, 2022. BCL has been supplying ethanol to the OMC’s since 2018.

BCL distillery can manufacture ENA/ethanol from multiple crops which has reduced its dependency on a single crop and thus the company can avoid the vagaries of raw material price fluctuations.

Capacity expansion of 3.5x times
The company currently has 200 KLPD capacity in Bathinda.

300 KLPD addition in West Bengal
BCL wants to capitalize on the ENA deficit demand scenario of North-Eastern India by setting up a 200 KLPD state-of-the-art ENA plant at Kharagpur, West Bengal. The company has joined hands with M/s. Svarna Infrastructure in building this capacity and owns 75% equity in this new project. The capacity is expected to come online by Q4FY22.

The company plans to further expand this capacity by another 100KLPD by Q3FY23 as land and power required for further capacity expansion is already in place.

200 KLPD addition in Bathinda
The company has obtained permission to add another 200 KLPD Grain Based Biofuel Distillery in Bathinda. All the prerequisites for expansion like land, power and cheap finance (interest subvention) are already in place and capacity is expected to start production in Q3FY23.

Latest update on capacity expansion as of Jan 11, 2022
We hereby submit business update that the initial plant testing at the 200 KLPD Ethanol plant of Subsidiary of the Company viz. Svaksha Distillery Limited has begun and the commercial production at this plant is expected to commence in the next few months before end of financial year 2021‐22. The Unit is being set up without raising any debt.

Further, the Subsidiary of the Company has also obtained in principal approval from MoEF for enhancing the capacity by another 100 KLPD at the same premises. The Subsidiary has all the requisite land and utilities arranged for the expansion. The work to install and establish another 100 KLPD will begin soon after commissioning commercial production at the 200 KLPD plant and will be executed at minimal capex due to the existing facilities. The 100 KLPD expansion is expected to be completed in financial year 2022‐23.

After the commencement of commercial production at Svaksha Distillery Limited in year 2021‐22 and the proposed expansion plant of 100 KLPD, the total capacity of the Subsidiary of the Company shall be 300 KLPD.

Further, as already informed, the Company (BCL Industries Limited) is also undergoing the expansion at Bathinda Unit by way of setting another 200 KLPD plant. The work for the Bathinda plant is on‐going at full swing. After commencement of commercial production in its new plant, the total capacity of the Company in Bathinda shall be 400 KLPD.

With all units of the Company and Subsidiary generating production, the total capacity of the Company (BCL Industries Limited) together with its Subsidiary (Svaksha Distillery Limited) will be 700 KLPD and we will be one of the largest producers of Ethanol from grains in private sector in India.

Key risks
Broken rice is mainly used to produce ENA and any rise in its price will directly impact gross profit.

Final product prices are decided by state/central governments and/or OMCs (oil marketing companies) and hence, regular price hike is not a guarantee for profitability.

Ban on sale and consumption of alcohol in Gujarat, Bihar, Nagaland and Lakshadweep. If the governments in states that BCL operates in decide to ban or restrict the use of alcohol, it will have an
adverse impact.

Execution risk as the expansion undertaken is massive.

Financials

Extrapolating 1HFY22 numbers the company is set to do Rs80crs plus in FY22 and is trading a P/E of
14.1x at the current market cap of Rs1127crs with 3.5x capacity expansion over the next 2 years

Other resources

Company website https://www.bcl.ind.in/
Latest results concall transcript https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/46718bab-8eba-4cea-8f5f-9b0406a19ec9.pdf

Disclosure: Invested

3 posts - 2 participants

Read full topic

ANG Lifesciences - Will it prosper or perish?

$
0
0

ANG Lifesciences

Introduction:

ANG Life science India limited is a leading pharmaceutical company engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of finished pharmaceutical formulations across all dosage forms. The company has geographical presence across India, Africa, Latin America, Gulf Countries & ROW etc. Presently, the company owns and operates 7 state of the art manufacturing facilities & manufactures over 1000+ formulations at Baddi (H.P). These facilities are designed to meet the requirements of both advanced as well as emerging market opportunities.

Company headquarter is at Amritsar whereas plants are located at Baddi, HP. Company has grown through acquisitions in the vicinity of existing plants. They are into formulation business catering to government institutions, contract manufacturing and direct selling (through stockists). Some of their clients are Hetero, Genx, Gland, Wockhardt, Zuventus, Emcure, various state govt / agencies, etc. It has an employee strength of around 800.

Company was originally incorporated in 2006 and listed on BSE SME platform in Sept ’17. It migrated from BSE SME platform to Main board of BSE in Nov ’21. Company is not listed on NSE.

In Sept ‘17, IPO was issued at Rs. 80 per share (total size of Rs. 12 cr which was used for doubling capacity that time). From that day, till Jun ’21, it was trading in range of Rs. 80 to Rs. 120. (On websites, you will see chart showing range of Rs. 40 – Rs. 60 due to bonus issue 1:1 in Sept ’21). From June ’21 to Nov ’21, price saw a one-way run, reaching peak of Rs. 726 on 1st Nov. Since then, its correcting and currently priced at Rs. 346.

Ownership & Management:

71.09% held by promoters in the name of Rajesh Gupta (70.9%) and Saruchi Gupta (0.19%). No other promoters / promoter companies. Ownership seems very neat. Rest of the holding is with public. No institution / corporate body hold stake in the company. Rajesh Gupta has pledged 42.3% of his holding.

Mr. Rajesh Gupta – Executive Director (Civil Engineer) (Responsible for marketing and manufacturing)

Mrs. Saruchi Gupta – Executive Director (Commerce graduate) (Responsible for accounts and finance)

Mr. Sukhpal Singh – Non-executive Independent director (Architect)

Mr. Pawanjit Singh – Non-executive Independent director (under graduate; into construction business)

Mrs. Chetna – Non-executive independent director (L.L.B. + CS + MBA)

Smt. Sudesh Kumari – Non-executive non-independent director (Bachelor of Arts)

Mrs. Nupur Gupta – Non-executive non-independent director (Commerce graduate)

Subodh Sharma – CFO (MBA + L.L.B.)

Plants:

All plants are located at Baddi, Himachal Pradesh.

Unit 1: Production block (45k sq. ft.) Manufacturing of dry powder injectables – 1st plant of the company

Unit 2: Acquired Star Biotech building – dedicated Penicillin formulation unit

Unit 3: Acquired Jot Saroop Knits Pvt Ltd – Currently used as a warehouse (Surgical unit in future)

Unit 4: Production block (Cephalosporin Tablet, Cephalosporin Capsule and Dry Syrup & Sachet).

Unit 5: Production block (2.5 lac sq ft) product & capacity – Tablets (300 mn), Capsules (72 mn), Dry syrup section (2.4 mn), Liquid Syrup (9 mn), Liquid Injection Ampoules (9 mn), Liquid Injection Vials (7.2 mn), Prefilled Syringe (1.8 mn)

Unit 6: Production block (1 lac sq ft) product & capacity – Soft Geletin Capsules (60 mn), Lotion (0.7 mn), Ointment (3.6 mn)

Unit 7: Mansa Print & Publishers Ltd: Acquired this company under NLCT liquidation process in FY21. Engaged in printing and packaging business covering manufacturing of packaging products including cartons, corrugated boxes, aluminium foils, etc. It is strategic backward integration move as packaging cost is almost 15-20% of the cost of product.

Journey post listing:

2018-2021: Acquired Star Biotech and MBL Pharma Ltd and doubled the manufacturing capacity
Acquired Mansa Printers for backward integration of packing business
2021-2022: Completed acquisition of Ind-Swift Ltd Unit 3 & 4, Presently renamed as Unit 4 & 5 of ANG Life Sciences for Rs. 60 cr on deferred payment basis
Commissioning of Penicillin unit in Star Bio-Tech at the end of this Current FY
Continuous Automation and process improvement efforts to help attain higher capacities and to add New Molecules.
Plans to venture into API & its derivative & in forward integration.
Plans to venture into B2C Healthcare business.
2022-2023: To Setup Greenfield facility of Anti- Cancer and Nutraceuticals in existing surplus land available in times ahead.

In Nov ’21, acquired 100% shares of ANG Healthcare India Pvt Ltd for Rs. 4 cr. It’s a group company (same promoter). ANG Healthcare India Private Limited is a marketing company selling critical care products to Hospitals and Nursing Homes in therapeutic segments of anti-biotic, anti-infective, anti-malarial, pain management etc. The company has got presence all over India through a network of Super Stockists and 150 Stockists along with a strong sales force of about 60 personnel and expanding at a fast pace. It has FY21 revenue of 9.27 cr and FY22 target of 16 cr.

For acquisition from M/s Ind- Swift Ltd, as against acquisition cost of Rs. 60 cr, company has paid Rs. 22.51 cr (Net cash flow from operations). Balance payment of Rs 37.48 cr will be paid in Equal Annual installment in subsequent years. Acquisition of the company will provide potential annual revenue of Rs. 500 cr – Rs. 600 cr. It is worth pondering that Ind-Swift is a loss making entity and they sold these units to reduce debt (source: company transcript). However, ANG see huge potential in these assets.

ANG is metamorphosing it, from manufacturing dry powder injectable to manufacturing wide range of pharmaceutical formulations, through its recent acquisitions. M/s Star Biotech was under distress sale and ANG acquired it for Rs. 10 cr. ANG will use this company to manufacture Pencillin products like dry powder injections, dry syrups, and tablets. Brownfield expansion for the same in expected to commission in Q3 FY22. It is expected to generate additional revenue of Rs. 250 cr.

It has also acquired Jyot Sarup Knits Pvt. Ltd and MBP Pharma.

Products:

Dry powder injection (for Anti Biotics, Anti Ulcerant, Gluco corticoid and Anti inflammatory, Anti Malarial and Anesthetic)

Liquid injection

Hard Gelatin Capsule

Tablet Beta Lactum

Tablets

Liquid Suspension / Syrup

Ointment / Creams

Soft Gelatin Capsule

Financials:

9 years trend is available. There is consistent growth in revenue and profitability. Net profit margin has improved from 0.5% (2014) to 3% (2016) to 5% (2018) to 5% (2021) to 16% (H1 FY22).

H1 FY22 Consolidated financials:

As part of the listing requirement, being on SME platform, company is required to provide half yearly financials. Hence Sept ’21 period is available. Going forward, they will have to provide quarterly financials which is currently not available.

image

image

Of Rs. 215 cr, Rs. 160 cr was to domestic firm, Rs. 28 cr was deemed export and Rs. 1 cr was export.

During H1, company has invested Rs. 63 cr to purchase fixed assets. Of this, Rs. 24 cr was from internal accrual and balance was from debt. (Although 1 doubt: In BS long term borrowing has increasing by Rs. 51 cr (Consolidated H1) whereas in CF, borrowing is only Rs. 41 cr.)

Comment by Mr. Rajesh Gupta on H1 FY22 performance:

This half yearly was embarked with great macro challenges, deceleration of economic activity and other issues related to logistics and supply of raw materials. Despite all these hurdles, ANG has been able to achieve stupendous topline growth, mainly driven by demand surge in all our key products with healthy order book from domestic and Multifold Rise in Export orders. Our efforts on product rationalization, focus on high margin products, cost control initiatives and improvement in operational matrix with better supply chain management have yielded results. The margins have improved significantly more than double from last year, mainly because of acquisitions and higher realizations in the Formulations. We have been striving continuously in pushing our Formulations business and thus have been spending extensively on _ acquisition’s and promoting our own brands through domestic branding. ANG’s wide range of basket of 1000+ formulations, and non-dependence on any one formulation helped us to clock a turnover of INR 215.54 Cr which includes just 10% of Covid portfolio. We will continue to launch new Formulations in coming times like Complex Steroids, Hormones and Anti-Retro Viral and to include wide range of Oncology products.”

Production Capacity:

In 2017, company had production capacity of 70 mn pcs per annum for dry powder injections. Its utilization was in FY15 (38%), FY16 (67%) and FY17 (73%).

Below is the current capacity:

Products Capacity (Mn unit per annum)
Tablets 3000
Liquid injection Ampoules 90
Liquid injection vials 48
Liquid Syrup 120
Dry Syrup 12
Soft Geletin Capsule 960
Lotion 4
Ointment 24

Current capacity utilization detail is not available.

Future plans:

ANG’s more than 50 Product Registrations are under way (Under Registration) in countries like Yemen, Latin America, Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar, Uganda, Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria, Congo, Libya, Combodia, Senegal, Togo, Bolivia, Brazil, Venezuela & CIS Countries.

ANG has targeted to Submit Dossiers for 250+ products for registrations in countries like Latin America, South East Asia & African countries by FY24.

They are planning to launch 30 to 50 new product formulation by end of current FY and will launch 200 new product formulation by H1 FY23.

They plan to file DMFs for all new molecules in regulated and semi-regulated market.

Company plans to venture into API derivative Menthol by the end of current FY.

Company is targeting to cross Rs. 350 cr revenue in FY22 and Rs. 800-850 cr in FY23 through domestic brand building, manufacturing of high molecules in existing facilities, product registration in various different countries and commissioning of M/s Star Biotech plant. It plans to achieve sale of Rs. 2000 cr by FY26.

Company is also planning to set up greenfield facility for anti-cancer and nutraceuticals in existing surplus land available in times ahead.

They are also open to more acquisitions to fuel growth.

ANG’s Export share will rise to 30% In current FY as compared to just 7% in FY 20-21 ANG is targeting Rs. 500 cr revenue from Exports by FY24.

Source: Investor Presentations, Listing prospectus, Annual Report

Disclosure: Not invested, Tracking

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Autoline Industries

$
0
0

Autoline Industries is engaged in manufacturing sheet metal components, assemblies and sub-assemblies like Foot Control Modules, parking brakes, hinges, cab stay and cab tilt, exhaust systems, tubular structures, fabrications, etc. for large OEMs in the Automobile Industry. They have a product portfolio of over 1500 products including parts from 1g all the way till 400 kg.

Their major divisions are as follows:

Almost 80% of company’s revenues comes from a single customer-Tata Motors. They are sole sheet metal suppliers for number of models like ACE, Bolt, Zest, Indica, indigo etc.

Key thesis here is a potential turnaround story.

In Q2 FY22 they made their highest sales in 12 quarters and first-time positive PAT in last 12 quarters (excluding Q4 FY19 where there was 45 Cr other income):

While debt to equity is still very high, it is important to note that they have already reduced debt by Rs 120 Cr in last 3 financial years.

We also find that debt and interest repayment entry has been very large in cash flow statement over last several years.

In the process of debt reduction, they have also converted debt into equity shares.

They have also sold some properties and consolidated the manufacturing facilities (divestment of assets?). Even more important, they have used part of the proceeds for repaying debt.

Company did preferential allotment to marquee investors.

The issue price of Rs 40 seems fair since on 2 June 2021, the market price was Rs 38

There has been a change in top management (CEO) with Mr Shivaji Akhade (who was a director since inception) becoming CEO.


They have implemented various cost cutting measures.

Management commentary is also positive regarding a clear intention of turnaround.

As mentioned earlier, Tata Motors is 80% of revenue so customer concentration is a big risk. They are very intent on reducing the customer concentration.




They are also making significant inroads into EVs through electric cycles.

It seems like management is extremely determined to turnaround the business. They have prepared a clear plan of action and they have executed on the plans very well so far.

Their guidance is for 650 Cr revenue in FY23 with 12% EBITDA margin.
image

This implies an expected FY23 EBITDA of Rs 78 Cr. Against this, TTM EBITDA is Rs 26 Cr. Market cap is Rs 290 Cr and EV is Rs 420 Cr. This suggests a 6x FY23 EV/EBITDA.

Disc- have a tracking position

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Healthium Medtech IPO discussion

$
0
0

Brief overview: Healthium Medtech is the largest independent medical device company in India. It is a leading player in the surgical consumables market in India and urology collection devices market in the UK. It operates in four focus areas, namely, advanced surgery, urology, arthroscopy and wound care across three key markets, namely, India, UK and rest of the world (RoW). One in five surgeries conducted globally uses a Healthium product as of March 31, 2021.

Healthium is owned and controlled by Apax partners with >99% shareholding who is now looking to offload ~40% of its stake in the IPO via OFS at $1bn valuation.

3 key questions:

  1. Do you believe the $1bn pre-money valuation is justified? PE investors have made decent returns - would enough be left for public investors?

Few data points:
a. Apax partners bought out the company from existing shareholders, including TPG Growth, CX Partners, and founding shareholders in CY18 for ~$350mn. During FY18, it reported revenue of Rs5.5bn (~$75mn), EBITDA/ PAT margin of ~22%/13.5%. This implies transaction value at ~4.7x FY18 revenue (feels expensive?). At rumored $1bn valuation, Apax partners would make ~2x return on its investment in ~4 yrs. During FY21, it reported revenue of Rs7.1bn (~$95mn) i.e. ~30% increase vs FY18, EBITDA/ PAT margin of ~20%/12%.

b. TPG Growth invested in Healthium (formerly Sutures India) first in 2013 by acquiring a 23% stake from CX Partners and the company’s promoters for ~Rs1.5bn. Over time, TPG raised its stake and before stake sale to Apax partners, it held ~73% stake in Sutures India. Assuming deal value at $350mn, it would have received ~$255mn for its shares against which it made an investment of ~$100mn over the years (excl. sale of stake in Quality needles) implying return of ~1.6x or >20% IRR over the period.

c. Media reports suggest CX Partners exited Sutures India with overall return of 2.2x.

  1. How would you think of the long term growth in topline and build margins over the coming years?

Few data points:
a. Considering acquisition of Vital care, AbGel and CareNow during FY22 – it could comfortably post a topline of Rs11bn during FY22 (~100% increase vs FY18) whilst EBITDA/ PAT margin is likely to be in line at pre-acquisition levels.

b. Government initiatives for promoting domestic manufacturing could help it gain via import substitution (given ~70% of medical devices are imported) - Are any of the products eligible under the PLI scheme?; Thrust on increasing exports could be a tailwind for the company too - Could this be the next Pharma opportunity? Any good reading material/ content/ discussion/ case studies on the emergence of the Indian Pharma industry and Pharma players during early 2000s; Increasing regulatory interventions - Medical device regulations, 2017 and EU MDR 2021 could drive market share gains.

c. Increasing emphasis on affordable healthcare along with it being subject to pricing regulations in India (Drug Price Control order) and UK (NHS, UK Drug Tariff) - could likely cap the margins; what levers would company have then to improve its margins?

  1. What P/E multiples do you think markets would be ready to assign such a company for FY23/24E? and which companies could be considered comparable? (even globally)

Few data points:

a. Poly Medicure is also a leading player in the medical devices industry in India with focus on consumables segment like Healthium. Although, it derives >70% of its revenue from Infusion therapy products like IV Cannula, Catheters etc. Whilst it had comparable revenues of Rs7.9bn during FY21, it had better significantly better margin profile with EBITDA/ PAT margin at 28%/17%. It trades at ~50-60x TTM EPS. Healthium would have to trade at similar multiples to justify the $1bn valuation. Possible? Finding answer to “What makes poly medicure trade at such premium multiples?” could possibly help.

Lastly, appreciate any channel partner connects along with any surgeons on the ValuePickr platform who use/ recommend their product. Look forward to your views.

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Axis bank - Turnaround imminent

$
0
0

Axis bank is the 3rd largest private bank and is trading at a discount to its peers.

On the liability side their CoF is just 3.6 with a good number of CASA accounts.

The SA accounts have high AMB’s lead by the Burgundy franchise. They also have a good number of accounts with the armed forces

On the asset side they have massively improved over the last few years, the BB and below pool is now 1.79% and 80% of retail advances are secured. The RWA to total assets have also declined steadily indicating improving safety of lending Retail advances are 55% of total advances. Gross NPA’s are less than1%, restructured loans are 0.63% of gross customer assets the lowest among top Private Banks and the are sitting on 13,400 crs of unutilised covid provisions that will act as a stabiliser to the future earnings


The total assets are > 10 lakh crores and they are well on their was to achieve a sustainable 1.5% RoA which would mean a yearly run rate of 15000 crs in profits. Just valuing this at 2x book (the banks current valuations) would lead to a market cap compounding of ~15%. Also the leverage of the bank is currently ~10x so the assets can compound at 15% as well.

And this is without taking the valuation of the subsidiaries into account. Currently 3.8% of assets are low yielding RIDF bonds that axis bank holds because they could not meet prior priority sector lending, the gradual run off of these bonds will lead to a NIM expansion along with repo rate hikes that will increase the yields on home loans that are 37% of retail advances

The bank is well capitalised at 15% core tier 1 and 13k crs of excess provisions. This is combined with the fact that axis can raise AT1 bonds domestically and abroad incase needed

In my view the bank is well capitalised and fully ready to take advantage of the capex recovery when it happens. The bank has completely transformed itself from the bank that got into the NPA mess in the mid 2010’s. Mr Amitabh can continue for the next decade. Even without a significant valuation rerating there is good scope to compound at 14-15% over the next decade.

Headwinds:

  1. Legacy accounts like srei could pose an issue down the
  2. Government could offload its SUUTI stake at higher valuations
  3. Without a capex recovery the excess liquidity and capital will drag down RoE’s

sources

Disc invested

1 post - 1 participant

Read full topic

Viewing all 1802 articles
Browse latest View live